|
|
|
|
Articles: TP Special | | krIstu pUrvam&E telugu jADalu | |
|
| Im sure both Telugu & Tamil are BC languages...But being a Telugu, I am sayin this that many ppl in our country agree that Tamil is older than Telugu...(I think so)
Posted by: UK At: 12, Nov 2007 10:02:53 AM IST
Inthaku Telugu paathadaa leka Tamil language paathadaa...LOLz
Posted by: UK At: 12, Nov 2007 8:56:57 AM IST
Thanks Dr. Dame Raja Reddy for your dedication and work and also I thank Mr. Udayavarlu T. for the article. I am interested in those 10 books written by Dr. Raja Reddy. where do we find these books ?
Posted by: Mr. vishnu movva At: 22, Oct 2007 7:14:41 AM IST
Wow...Hats off reddi garu. Good work and wish i can read some of your books.
Posted by: Mr. Suneel Kumar Kanuri At: 2, Oct 2007 2:56:55 AM IST
A good work . It is recorded in History how Alexander envied the army of Andhras when he fought Magadha. Even in Mahabharatha there is reference to Andhras who fought on behalf of Kauravas.
Having visited East and West parts of the world and various Museums we can safely conclude Telugu is oldest language. Because DMK is supporting Congress, for political reasons UPA Government declared Tamil as oldest language.This is not because of any Historical evidence or study.
Posted by: Mr. DWIBHASHYAM AGASTHYESWAR Agasthyeswar At: 24, Sep 2007 9:09:17 PM IST
malak pETa rauDI, ninnu mechchukuMTunnaanu... vEsukO vIrataaDu...
Posted by: Bullibasu Bullibasu At: 22, Sep 2007 11:08:21 AM IST
Posted by: Bullibasu Bullibasu At: 21, Sep 2007 8:46:43 PM IST
__________________________________________________
nizamE - nEnu oppukunTunnaa - idivarakaTlaa brOuzar tO ibbandi lEkapOyinaa alavaaTu koddI inglIshulOnE kaanichchESaa
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 21, Sep 2007 9:32:20 PM IST
telugu jaaDalu krIstu pUrvam uMDi uMDochchu kaani...ippuDu maatraM sarigaa lEvu. oka saari kriMda chUDaMDi.okka telugu mukka kanabaDutuMdEmO.
Posted by: Bullibasu Bullibasu At: 21, Sep 2007 8:46:43 PM IST
Another Example Ve Va ji
- Currently 99% of Vedas is unavailable and most probably we have lost the knowledge - People know that it happened because they were limited to a sect of people who failed to pass the knowledge onto the next generations and the other sects - It would be definitely immature for somebody to say thousand years down the lane 'Some Dravidian Fanatic destroyed Vedic Literature and thats why we dont have any info on 99% of Vedas!'
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 20, Sep 2007 12:15:36 PM IST
Hey Vevaji,
Loooong time - How are you?
Well well Death of a language is different from the destruction - Take for instance -
Not many people in India speak Sanskrit today - Does it mean that somebody destroyed the language? A langauge may die due to many reasons and even in case of Brahmi script, there has been no evidence of people destroying it.
I totally agree Telugu is different to to take it further, recent studies state that Telugu is older than Tamil! It is an independent language too - Yes I agree .. but the issue of discussion here is (You will have to go thru all the discussions/fights happened between me and Kakulavaram in atleast a dozen threads) - He claims that Telugu literature before Nannayya is not available because somebody burnt it -
My point is burning manuscripts dont kill the literature or make it invisible for centuries altogether - The case you are mentioning is totally different ... I am not talking about a langauge fading away because of natural reasons - I am specific about destruction by force - I cant believe it because there has been no case in History ( Atleast as far as I know - I will stand corrected if I am proved wrong) wherein a few people could destroy the literature (ironically, belonging to their own language) completely!
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 20, Sep 2007 12:07:45 PM IST
| |
|
|
 |
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
.gif)
