Cinema bagunda leda anthe manaki kavalasindi. Evado eppudo baga perunnavaadu chinna tappu raasthe adi correct ayyipothundi.Edukante vaadu goppodu vadu cheppinavanni eppativaraku correct so edu kooda correct ani antaaru.
Anni sagam assumptions,
Gopanna cotton dress vesukunevaadu, a dress eppudu chirigi undedi, ane chinna lopalani choodakunda unte manchidi.Naagarjuna unfit, elanti comments waste.he has done well in Annamayya, towards the climax he was too good.
Bharavi manchi research chese script raasi untadani anukuntunna.Story lone emanna tappu unte correcct cheyyadani ki try cheyyadi.
E cinemalo oka tappu unte adi cinema hit ayyesariki right ayyipothundi.Manchi vallu kooda tappulu chestharu so alantivi correct cheyyandi.
Govt. kooda elanti cinema scripts reveiw chesthe manchidi.lekapothe tharuvatah generation, Raghavendara rao e raghavendraswamy anukune pramadam undi.
Posted by: Mr. krishna vamsi At: 3, Apr 2006 12:20:34 PM ISTBoth the Director & Producer must have taken a great care in the costumes of Ramadoss and his wife. Nagarjuna once again proved that he is unfit for such roles since he always dominates himself with the most latest and modern costumes and make up. Originally Ramadoss was never wearing any silk costumes except handloom cotton dress over his body. Probably Raghavendrarao would have attempted to keep some modernity in costumes, jewelery etc. It has spoiled the whole sanctity of the person Gopanna, who is a shepherd. There should have been more picturisation on the subject of his shepherd community (golla-yaadava)and his co-associates from the same community becoming his disciples in the construction of Bhadrachalam Ram temple. It is very deliberately and purposely avoided and nonsence was added to the deleted original and the picture is completed. Sneha acted very well with her sweet and mesmerizing smiles. Nagarjuna deserves only zero marks along with the producer Kondamraju, and director Kovilamudi Raghavendrarao withhis B.A. degree to his name.
