|
|
Articles: My Thoughts | Comments , their Influence | |
| thank u andee "Mr. wemasterit" .
By expressing my views further briefly , me too want to wind it up here itself.
we can know others iff(if and only if) they tell us about them ...
so unless otherwise the writer (he/she) tells us (his/her's) inner views ...we can't know what exactly they are expecting from readers side ..[if i am not wrong ..!!!].
so compiling their experiances with readers and the influences on the feedbacks into a one article gives us (readers) complete idea of what their inner ideas and how those have influenced them ... which may be a good platform to have good (without words war)interaction between writer and reader ... who knows!! that may gives more knowledge to BOTH (writer as well as reader) ...
here i want to mention one more point ...
there are very intelligent and capable persons among readers who can write(may write) in a better way than the existing writers ...but these persons don't find encouragement (ofcourse some times lazyness) to pen them into articles or publish them in magazines ... so by giving feedbacks for the articles written by others they can show their caliber and this is one of the opportunities to show their inner talent ...
and they can prove that they are good critics and good at thinking , analysing & judging ...(do u agree with me??).
actually ...long back (months ago) i read article "DOWRY SYSTEM" by the same author ..and have given the feedback on it ... if time permitts ...pls have a glance on the feedback i have given and there was a big war between us ,ofcourse only through Tp.com articles ....
and she has expressed the same (in an indirect way) in the atricle by her "Experiances with tp.com" ...
and also i mentioned that ... that was my last posting (sorry for not keeping my words)...
y'day i read this article and feedbacks .. and thought of posting my views ...
Thank u once again ...and me too wish
good day (and also good nights as bonus)
for U , for tp.com intelligent readers and great writers ...
Murali Mohan T
Posted by: Mr. Murali Mohan T At: 26, Mar 2003 10:51:49 AM IST a good one , though a bit lengthy :) . but my point is still not taken ... i said why should one compile the comments in to one article and post them here? well if u say its his/her personal matter .. i have nothing to offer.
one can keep the comments to one's self and shape himself accordingly, for which u dont have to show it to the whole world.
anyway .. the topic is already off its track . i better wind it up from my side.
have a good day.:)
Posted by: Mr. sarath chava At: 25, Mar 2003 9:29:46 PM IST writers(those who have stuff) ki self respect anedhi ekkua gaa vuntundhi (i feel so).
if they want to write some thing on a particular topic ...they will think in
many directions , analyse , collect more & more info on the same ..and then they will give some final shape to that topic...
so we (readers)should not forget the imp of rigorous work done by writers(who r of capable) and should always respect them .
when they are asking heartily for some feedback from readers..it is just to know ... how the view of the others on the same topic ...and they may also come to know new things from "INTELLIGENT" reader's feedbacks ...which may be helpful while writing some other new topics ..
writer will observe (read)the feedback they
are getting from readers and they take good things from the genuine ones ...
if they get +ve response from readers ..well and good ...they feel that they r on right track ...
if they get -ve feedback ...they think once before writing next time ...
at the same time ...annintikante chaalaa IMP thing enti ante ...how many readers are writing the feedback exactly as what they have in mind ...
kontha mandhi readers untaaaru ...aaahaa ...oooho ...emi raasaarandee ...simply superb ...ani feed back istaaru (even if they understand nothing)...
mari kontha mandhi vuntaaru ...vaallaku eduti vaallu cheppindhi oppose cheyatame pani ...vaallu... meeru raasindhi just trash ...alaa,,, ilaaa ani raastaaru ...
mind lo oka opinion vuntundhi ..
feedback maro vidham gaa istaaru ...
alaantappudu oka writer thananu thaanu correct gaa elaa judge chesukogaluguthaaru ??
so readers koodaa proper gaa feed back ivvaali ...
nachindanukondi ..endhuku nachindo clear gaa cheppaali ...which made them to like that topic ? anedhi clear gaa raayaali ...
nachaledanukondi ...nirbhayam gaa ...ekkada nachaledho ...endhuku nachaledho ...cool gaa explain chestoo raayaali .anthe kaanee writer meeda personal gaa comments cheyakoodadhu ...
oka writer love stories raasinantha maatraana ...(athanu/aame) premalo peekala lothu koorukupoyaarani artham kaadhu kadhaa ...
edainaa sad story raasinantha maatraana ...vaallu eppudoo edustooo vuntaarani kaadhu kadhaa ...
what they write doesn't refelct their personal life ...i mean thellagaa kanapadevanni paalu kaadhu ani ...so edainaa topic chadivinappudu readers koodaa writers ni personal comments cheyakoodadhu ...
that is not at all a good sign ..
emi pani ledhu ..time pass kosam "SHARE MY THOUGHTS " section lo edo oka topic open chesi mind ki edi thoste adi feedback raaayatam kaadhu ...alaa raayatam writers ni thappu throva pattinchadame ...
feedback raayalante ..chadivina daanni clear gaa understand chesukuni ups and downs ento clear gaa raayaali ...ledante feedback raayakundaa vundatam nayam...
writers koodaa "guddi eddu chelo paddattu" emi follow ayiporu ..readers iche feedback chadivi ...they r intelligent enough to judge themselves ..than what we readers think of ...
edo feedback lo raasaaru kadhaa ..ani cheppi .. vaalla sontha opinions ni antha easy gaa change chesukoru ....
meeru chalam raasina STHREE (lady)chadivi vunte thelustundhi ...
aaa book ki preface(mundu maata ) atleast 3 to 4 times raasaaru ..enduku raayavalasi vachindante even if he has written that in 1940s , the book was published and came into market only in 1970s ...
athanu final preface lo emantaarante
""nenu 1945 lo emi raasaano ... ade ippatikee correct ani nenu anukuntunnaanu ... i find nothing to change in these 3 decades even if i read it many times"" ...
ofcourse konthamandhi athanidhi stubborn nature anukovachu ...but once they read the book ...deffinitely they will come to a conclusion that he is 100% true at his statement...so u can estimate how strong will-power and selfrespect the writers will be having ...
okko reader okko vidam gaa think chestaaru ...alaa ani writer just andarinee aananda parachaalani vaallu raayalanukunna daanni dilute chesi emi raayaru kadhaa ...
writer mostly generalised gaa rastaaru ...they don't write articles by keeping one kind (group) of people in mind just to satisfy them ...
ikkada views post chesinappudu chaalaa mandhi vraasaaru
""mee manasulo vundedhi meeru raasinappudu , meeru feedback chadivi mee opinion maarchukolenappudu enduku feedback adagatam"" ani ...
rojukoka reader(so called critic) okko vidam gaa feedback istoopothey writer ganta gantaki ...roju rojukoo opinion change chesukovaalsi vastundhi ...
ika appudu vaallu assalu "writer" elaa avuthaaru ..."tholu bomma" avuthaare thappa endukante adokkate (bomma ) kadhaa eduti vaalla chetullo elaa aadiste alaa aadedhi ...
good writers vaalla vignatha(intelligence)use chesi thaarkikam(logical) gaa think chesi ..
if the feedback given by a particular reader is so strong , deep & convincing enough to prove that the writer is wrong at his/her views on the particular topic ...definitely the writer will appreciate the feedback and will change their ideas if necessary ... anthe kaanee evaro edo cheppaaru ani views emi maarchukovaalsina avasaram ledhu writers ki ...assalu writers meedha feedback influence vundadhu ani kaadhu ...sure gaa vuntundhi ..but entha influencive gaa vuntundhi anedhi maatram reader ichina feedback lo vunna satthaa(stuff) dependant ...
ilaa raastoo pothey pravaaham aagadhu ..better i stop myself here ...
thanks a lot (for those who read this patiently)
Murali Mohan T
Posted by: Mr. Murali Mohan T At: 25, Mar 2003 5:31:24 PM IST kaadandi. meeku kaavaalsina answer ni naa reply lo, implicit gaa oohinchukuntunnaaremo.
tappakundaa comments prabhaavam untundi.
Naaku yenno thoughts unnaayi. raayaali anukuntaanu kaani yeppudoo raayanu. kaani yevarainaa mail pampinchi, feedback chadivite, appudu raayaalane utsaaham vastundi.
No doubt that we must have the inclination and interest in us. But Comments do have impact on us.
Posted by: Ms. Prasanthi Uppalapati At: 24, Mar 2003 8:34:40 AM IST adi sangati mari. decision teesukonedi manam . manaki istam vachinatlu teesukontaam . inka evaro cheppedaaniki enduku importance ivvadam .
meere oppukonnaru , comment prabhavam undadu ani .. evari perception valladi ani .
Posted by: Mr. sarath chava At: 24, Mar 2003 2:24:33 AM IST avasaram ledu. yevari standard vaallaki vuntundi. yenta generalise chesukunna, yevari standard prakaarame vaallu perceive chesukuntaaru, alaage respond avutaaru. We should think and take decisions on our own.
Posted by: Ms. Prasanthi Uppalapati At: 24, Mar 2003 1:17:41 AM IST "Genuine" anedi .. relative... Comment chese vaadiki adi eppudoo "Genuine" gaane anipistundi. alaane manaki nachaka pote anipinchadu. nachite "Genuine" ane anipistundi manaki kooda.
mari alantappudu "Comments" anevi anni manchive avutayi. ala ayinappudu prati comment ki taggattu tanani taanu rachayita marchukovali. ????
Posted by: Mr. sarath chava At: 24, Mar 2003 1:05:52 AM IST avasaram ledu. "Vinadagu Nevvaru cheppina" reetilo, "comments" chadavandi. only if you treat them as "Genuine" consider otherwise just ignore. That's all.
Posted by: Ms. Prasanthi Uppalapati At: 23, Mar 2003 5:55:43 AM IST ante pakka vaadiki nachinatlu raayaala?
Posted by: Mr. sarath chava At: 23, Mar 2003 1:37:53 AM IST manasu spandinchinappude yevarainaa raastaaru. ayithe "Encouragement or Discouragement" anevaatilni, correct gaa artham chesukunte, mana lopaalu telusukoni, marinta chakkagaa express cheyagalugutaamu.
Posted by: Ms. Prasanthi Uppalapati At: 22, Mar 2003 8:27:47 AM IST
|
|
|
 |
Advertisements |
|
 |
 |
Advertisements |
|