|
|
Articles: My Thoughts | Comments , their Influence | |
| ante evaranna encourage or discourage chestene rachayita raastadanna maata. i learnt a new thing and that made my day .
Posted by: Mr. sarath chava At: 21, Mar 2003 10:19:35 PM IST naa articles meeda yevaremi anukuntunnaaru, ani telusukovaalane feeling naaku khachittamagaa undi. ika recognition antaaraa, worth unte vastundi, lekapote raadu. daani valla naakoche laabham yemiti?
ika nenu yenduku raasaanu naa meeda vachina comments ante, oka manishini comments yentalaa encourage chestaayi, inkaa inkaa raayaalane spoorthini yelaa kalugachestaayi teliya cheppadam kosame.
ika negative gaa anipinchina comments ni koodaa, hurt avakundaa, true intentions behind them artham chesukoni, improve chesukovaali ane naa abhipraayaanni cheppadam kosame.
"write whatever you want" ante "yedi padithe adi raayamani" kaadu. oka vela alaa raasina, ee site lo editors untaaru. vaallu delete chestaaru. "pedarthaalu" teeyavalasina avasaram undaa?
Anyway, I am not offended at all. Any comments are welcome. No problem.
Posted by: Ms. Prasanthi Uppalapati At: 21, Mar 2003 8:36:19 AM IST raayadam enduku ani adigite --- asalenduku raasaaru ani kaadu ...
kaani raasina daani gurinchi evaremi anukontunnaru ani malli daani gurinchi raayadam enduku ani ..
rachayita anevaadu spandiste raastadanukontunna naaku telisinanta varaku . ante kaani nenu raasina daaniki vaalemanukonnaru veellemanukonnaru ani raayakkarle.
meeru "Comments" ani title petti janam mee raata gurinchi emanukontunnaro ikkada post cheyalsina avasaram undaa?
post chesaaru ante ... u r after some kind of recognition. kaadantara?
Posted by: Mr. sarath chava At: 20, Mar 2003 11:44:36 PM IST It seems everyone misunderstood my true intentions. If anyone reads my article carefully, they can understand what I really mean. People perceive the things in different ways. Comments must encourage anyone to come up with some more good stuff. I felt that "abhimaanam" in the comment, a sense of elderlyness in that. That's why I cherish it and so I mentioned it. I wrote them only to make people understand the real sense of comments hidden it but not the actual words. This is all I can explain.
Ok. Bye.
Posted by: Ms. Prasanthi Uppalapati At: 20, Mar 2003 7:16:14 PM IST Hello Yugandhar,
A fool is always a fool
Though he went to school.
Again you are following Karl Max and Max Muller. Good luck!
Posted by: Mr. KVS Rama Rao At: 20, Mar 2003 3:58:07 PM IST Hello Ramarao garu,
You completely misunderstood me. I very much agree with you. That's why I always cherish that comment.
Hello wemasterit garu,
There is no need for forgiveness. We can write whatever we want. But why to write anything in the first place, "purre ko buddhi". There can be no perfect reason for it.
Posted by: Ms. Prasanthi Uppalapati At: 20, Mar 2003 3:02:46 PM IST lol lol lol :)
I could not resist my self.
Why shd anyone write anything in the first place?
to see what ppl think abt it?
i dont understand why this article is here .. forgive me if i m being rude .
Posted by: Mr. sarath chava At: 20, Mar 2003 7:26:33 AM IST Why I commented "A fool is always a fool/Though he went to schhol".
With your all educational qualifications you are criticizing greatmen who tread the path of Salvation. Saying this is meaningless.
Posted by: Mr. KVS Rama Rao At: 19, Mar 2003 3:53:18 PM IST i thought there might be scolding for me here, but i am disappointed for not finding them.
Posted by: Viplove K At: 18, Mar 2003 3:06:13 PM IST No. Yugandhar garu, In fact, he is not a fool. Actually the poem is "Salvation". My standard may not be upto the mark with respect to the subject. He is a very good and elderly person.
Coming to me, I am not offended even for the slightest. That's why I am posting these many articles. I wouldn't have mentioned it if I have offended.
Anyway, thanks for your comments.
Posted by: Ms. Prasanthi Uppalapati At: 16, Mar 2003 11:23:06 AM IST
|
|
|
 |
Advertisements |
|
 |
 |
Advertisements |
|