Comment and Discuss on TeluguPeople.com Articles

Page: 1 of 1

///Doesn't matter, fortunately no one cares for your Birth Certificate, here and no one would ask you to produce a photocopy attested by a Gazzeted Officer. Probably you can elaborate it in a paragraph in your autobiography! I was born & brought-up in Andhra Pradesh(Samaikhya), does it really matter to express my comments? I read that Dubaay Daavood Ibrahim too is also very much interested & active in 'Hyderabad affairs', does it matter?/// It does not matter for about my birth place and Daavood's interest we care and it matters for any Indian. You looks to be Anti-Nationalist. Though we we need all the regions in this country are to be developed equally and we also look in a broad perspect in the national level. If you do any stupidity we will certainly stop it at any cost and if Daavood does it, we through him out of the country. TS is going to form whomever tries to stop it. We are civilized people in the independant India and we will not sit and watch Andhra leaders (we are nothing to withe people) countinues to steel the Telangana resources. How can a State Secretariat have 90% of its employees from one region. Are you a blind man or Uneducated? Thanks, RK

Posted by: Mr. Ramakrishna Reddy Y At: 21, Feb 2007 2:43:14 AM IST

At the outset let me congratulate Mrs Shobha Rani for a good article. AP truly reflects the richness of Indian mosaic, in terms of its geography, history and cultural & spiritual plurality. The different regions of the state complement each other. In that, the vast coastline of the Andhra region and its excellent infrastructure and fertile delta lands are complemented by the arid ,dry and minerally rich Rayalaseema and Telangana. It is a fact that the development of different regions was influenced by their history. The backwardness of Telangana or the so called ‘forwardness’ of the coastal areas , has much more to do with the types of rulers they had during the last few hundreds of years rather than the last 50 years . While it is true that the rulers of AP, if they had been honest during the last 50 years, could have done much more for removal of the backwardness of different regions, they did not do so. It is true for all the three regions, namely north coastal Andhra, Rayalaseema and Telangana. However, by virtue of the fact that it is the capital, Hyd got much more attention than the other areas, sometimes at the cost of the other regions . Therefore, what is required is the focussed development of all the backward regions rather than division into separate states. It will be against the interests of these backward regions themselves. Also, viewed in the national context, it is undesirable and impractical to have frequent creation of new states. Jharkhand, Chattisgarh are bad/failed examples.

Posted by: Mr. Rajman Soman At: 17, Feb 2007 8:31:58 PM IST

First of all this article is nothing to do with Separate Telangana. If any body trying to concludes that the information in the article is the only reason for the backwardness of Telangana, that is not correct and if it is correct, why not recent past rulers (last 25-50 years) concentrated on this region to develop more or less equivalent to other regions of AP (including couple of districts of northern costal region and Rayalaseema) as you can see the impact of Eastern Germany after it merges to West Germany. If Telangana develops as SAMAIKYANDRA PRADESH, why did not happened since last 25-35 years. What is your logical background support that Separate TS can not develope as they are expecting and don't blindly argue and oppose for separate TS since they are asking for it. Whether it develops as a separate TS or not is different issue, however, is Andhra region going to loose any thing if Telangana separates? If not why do you worry for their demond. Dear friend, look at the facts, data of funds allocation, employment availability, deputations, employees ratio in Secretariyat, straitegically politically supression, why did not they supress Naxalism and other disturbances until they spreaded over Andhra and Rayalaseema region and got effected and lots of issues, things one can list out. One should not blindly argue, a person may be born in one region and settled in other region, grown up different region. One should think rationally and every region is part of Great India and every body should think that all regions should be more or less eaqually developed. I was born in Vizag, brought in Rayalaseema and settled in HYD which is, without any doubt, belongs to Telangana if you see as a region. Thanks, -Ram

Posted by: Mr. Ramakrishna Reddy Y At: 17, Feb 2007 3:11:40 AM IST

Author deserves appreciation for attempting to bring out the history and cultural aspects of telangana region to certain extent. Keeping the subject away from politics, topics such as value system, behavioural pattern,public relations etc in the past and present in the region can be highlighted in the articles, to come in future.

Posted by: Mr. Mohan Reddy Talusani At: 16, Feb 2007 5:06:48 AM IST

Page: 1 of 1