|
|
|
|
Articles: TP Features | | peMpuDu krimulu | |
|
| Firstly ,I thank you very much for sharing this Information Sir.The truth is from Macro to Micro everything played vital roles .Very Good Information.Please do post many more.
Posted by: Sudeshna At: 17, Apr 2007 10:28:43 PM IST
Now does that prove, genocide by europians in 'large' is wrong, because we don't know numbers? Now who are these 80 % writers who says it wrong? How many of them are mainstream historians? What is the new-est and most probable theory right now?
Just curious!
If you carefully read the population history of indigenous people of americas, the people who proposes 90% depopulation by diseases are not eurocentric, but on the contrary, they oppose it. Since you guys seem to be authoratative on this subject(you can see what is wrong and right), you know better.
Posted by: Ms. Mrunaalini At: 15, Apr 2007 7:41:32 AM IST
peddalu pheelayitE manniMchaali. aarTikal lO tappulaku naa maaTalalOni vyaMgyaM samaadhaanaM. bUtulu EmI vaaDalEdu kadaa nEnu.
Posted by: Bullibasu Bullibasu At: 14, Apr 2007 8:02:00 AM IST
I am prepared to discuss anything if the discourse is carried out in a decent manner. I am certainly not interested in this column if the comments begin with chadivEvALLu vedhavalu, iMdirA gAMdhI ammamma and so forth. If this is reduced to the level of a chatroom it is definitely not the place for me.
I have explained the purpose of my articles on several occasions. One can certainly have an opposite point of view but I won't stand indecent heckling. People like me write for the love of subject. If any of you have a different point of view or theory pl come forward with it in the form of an article, if necessary, as Dr. Peyyeti did.
Bullibasu did not begin his comments the way they appear now, and they refer to vij~nata .
Neither he nor I have first hand information on 16th century. We all go by available literature and information. The source has to necessarily be in English. An alternative theory can certainly be proposed if there is some basis.
Posted by: Dr. Rohiniprasad Kodavatiganti At: 12, Apr 2007 9:25:41 PM IST
naa kaameMTs sarigaa chUDaMDi. nEnu tappu ani vaayiMchaDaM lEdu. aayana vairas la vallanE 'aMtaa' chachchaaru aMTuMTE.. aMtaa kaadu, 'komtE' aMTunnaanu. thiyarI ni thiyarI ani maatramE cheppamaMTunnaanu. 'idi ilaanE jarigiMdi' ani cheppoddu aMTunnaanu. naa gOla meeku ardhaM ayiMdi anukunTunnaanu.
Posted by: Bullibasu Bullibasu At: 12, Apr 2007 7:14:53 PM IST
rOhiNiprasaad gaaru, ee topic meeru raasiMdi kaadu. evarO raasiMdi ikkaDa telugu lOki anuvadiMchaaru..Ti.pi. paaThakula kOsaM ani..saMtOshaM.. mari idi oka controvercial topic and still in debate ani meeku teliyadu anukOnu.meeku EkaMgaa 100 ki 90 maMdi vairas valla nE chanipOyaarani nirdhaaraNa chEsEsaaru. alaagani vairas prabhaavaM asalu lEdu ani anaDaM lEdu. vairas kUDaa oka kaaraNam ayi uMDochchu ani oka pratipaadana maatramE. 1542 lO meksikO janaabhaa eMtO kUDaa ippaTikI lekka sariggaa teliyadu. ee thiyarI lO pratipaadiMchinadaMtaa Uhaa saMkhyalu maatramE. yUrOpiyan laku charitra lO cheDDa pEru raakuMDaa chEstunna oka prayatnaM maatramE.
nirdhaaraNa kaani oka vishayaanni praSnistE mammalni Taim vEsTu gaaLLu aMTunnaaru. idi mee vijnata kE vadilEstunnaa..
speyin vaaLLE ekkuva SaataM janaanni chaMpEsaaru ani 100 ki 80 maMdi raiTars chebutunnaaru..vaaLLu eMduku karekT kaakUDadu?
ilaaMTi, janaaniki upayOgapaDani raatalu raasE raiTars eMta varaku avasaramO meekE teliyaali.
mee Taim vEsTu chEsaanani anukuMTE ...mee ishTaM.
'maLLI chebutunnaanu..vairas prabhaavaM assalu lEdu ani anaDaM lEdu. 100 ki 90 chaavulu vairas vallE anEdE pedda bUtu'
Posted by: Bullibasu Bullibasu At: 12, Apr 2007 7:51:56 AM IST
What are the facts, Mr. non-idiot bullibasu? Fellows like you are driving out writers from this forum.
Posted by: Dr. Rohiniprasad Kodavatiganti At: 11, Apr 2007 10:19:47 PM IST
Bush gives same kind on answers for straight questions asked by the media.He doesn't like to argue about facts. No wonder..every country has idiots.
Posted by: Bullibasu Bullibasu At: 11, Apr 2007 9:41:26 PM IST
Mrunaalini garu,
Thanks for the feedback. You can perhaps also read Bill Bryson's A Short History of Almost Everything.
Most of us don't have the time/energy to read all the books on all subjects. My articles are only a small attempt to get Telugu readers interested in some of these ideas. Some of these articles are being reproduced in printed monthlies.
I am not interested in getting into stupid arguments with people whose only contribution to these columns seems to be to heckle.
It is a waste of time to keep writing for websites where such guys are given prominence.
Posted by: Dr. Rohiniprasad Kodavatiganti At: 11, Apr 2007 9:29:27 PM IST
Nice article Dr. gaaru,
I feel like reading Gun, Germs & Steel or The wealth and poverty of nations, in telugu. I had, yali of new guinea's, questions too and I always wanted to read synopsis of chapters of those book and the history of similar lines and now its a great Joy to read that in telugu.
I keep on jumping from book to book and as interested more in lingusitics,I left jared diamond and jumped to Nicholas ostlar ( Empires of the word, a language history of the world). You should read it, if you havent already.
I will dig into more if I get sometime :-)
Posted by: Ms. Mrunaalini At: 11, Apr 2007 11:55:06 AM IST
| |
|
|
 |
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
