|
|
|
|
Articles: TP Features | | adanapu viluva | |
|
| Yes, Apparao Garu said he did not read anything. Still, just based on two essays, he posed a lot of questions and incorrect explanation of information. As he said he did not read anything, this is obviously expected.
Now when you don't read books and have questions and have wrong understanding, what should you do? If your objective is to get knowledge (whether you agree with it or not), then you go ahead and read those books. If not, do whatever you want, in this world.
All the answers are available with correct information in the books, 'Introduction to Capital', written by Ranganayakamma garu. If Mr. Apparao Garu reads those books, and even then he has questions, then we can attempt to discuss the same.
Without reading those books, if we have to type the material from those books here, it is meaningless. That is not possible.
I humbly request Apparao garu to read those books in order to get answers and correct information. The knowledge is available, but it is up to us to get it or not. It is an individual's right to decide.
With Best regards,
Bruno
Posted by: Mr. BRUNO RABA At: 30, Aug 2007 8:28:07 PM IST
Hello Mr. Hiren Chand, the author has declared clearly that he is a layman. Yes, for a layman who has never seen anything like a boat or ship, it would be difficult to assume that a heavy object would float on water.
The author has sincerely raised some questions. If you know the answers, try to explain what went wrong in his thinking.
It is your comment that sounds prejudiced and shallow, not the article. Instead of trying to pick at author's ignorance, try to enlighten all of us, if you can.
Posted by: Mr. Prasad T At: 30, Aug 2007 7:29:39 PM IST
This commonsense critique of Marxism is amusing at best shallow at worst. Sir, Mr Commonsense, that the stone thrown in water drowns is commonsense. So the boat or ship floating on the water must be against the 'commonsense', just like Marxism. Right? That is for your peripheral knowledge!!
Posted by: Mr. hiren hiren chand At: 30, Aug 2007 6:48:45 PM IST
maarksu siddhaantamlO lOTupaaTulani chakkagaaetti chuupi araTipamDu valachi chEtilO peTTinaTlu chuupinchaarau. chaalaa baagundi. aa adanapu viluva vachchinadaaniki muKyakaaraNam manishE ayinaa daanilOkUDA konta bhaagam utpattisaadhanaalanu ErpaaTu chEsi, Srama ni vaaDukoni chEsina vyaktiki kUDA simhabhaagam vunDAli ( adE laabham )
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 30, Aug 2007 9:49:53 AM IST
Thank you for your wonderful explanation against Marx philosphy. I hope left leaning professors read this article and get to their senses. China uses Communisim as a vehicle and use CPI, CPM and Maoists to do their dirty job. China on one hand building 2 dozen Nuclear power plants with US help and asking Indian Communists to oppose Indian Nuclear plants. Shame to Karath, Bardhan and all fellow left leaning professors & writers like Ranganayakamma.
PS: In Communist socity Party member is the BOSS. In Market driven society, the Invester is the BOSS. Atleast in Market Driven society, there are courts, democracy and free press which does no exist in Communist countries.
Posted by: Mr. R Desidi At: 29, Aug 2007 11:48:50 PM IST
| |
|
|
 |
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
