|
|
|
|
Articles: Philosophy | Good or bad
- Mr srinivas rao
| |
There is good because of bad, there is bad because of good. In fact, nothing is good, nothing is bad.
There is darkness, because of light, there is good, because of bad. And there is living being, because of non-living being. This is a simple observation, there is a cop because of thieves. Every existence is only because of another existence. If there is no bad, there is no need of presence of good. In such a situation, even though ‘good’ is presented, no one will notice that.
There is a group of some people, two of them having weapons, now we start noticing people with weapons and people without weapons in that group. We divide that group into such categories. Incase neither one of them doesn’t have weapons, we never get a thought of dividing that group by weapons. So, my saying is, there is good because there is bad. If there is no bad, we never think of good. As well as if there is no good, we never think of bad.
Either there must be complete good or complete bad. Then there will be no chance of observing good or bad. I want a state of existence where there is no bad and no good. And I want to be a part of neither bad nor good. That does not mean that there is no good or bad, but there is no observation or thought that there existed bad or good.
In fact, nothing is good, nothing is bad. How can we define good or bad? How can we identify good or bad? Nothing can be learnt in laws to distinguish good and bad. If a flower is bloomed in the morning having dews on petals, do we dare to define good or bad on the state of flower? We dare not. Because the process of blooming flower is natural phenomena, so we do not dare or have a thought of good or bad on it. We accept as it is.
So, which ever ‘action’ is followed in a natural process, there won’t be a question of good or bad. But if any thing happens against nature, then there will be raise of a question in our mind stating it good or bad. So we have generated a state either good or bad, it means we are against nature.
Because our state of ‘against nature’ takes us to define good or bad. If we are truly in the process of nature, there won’t be either good or bad, because in the process of nature, there is no good, there is no bad. Everything is acceptable, it is so true as sun rises in the east in the very morning. There is no chance of getting a thought to define good or bad on the ‘ action ‘ of rising sun. we are part of nature, ‘we’, ourselves, in nature. So there won’t be good or there won’t be bad. We are ‘we’.
It is very natural. Lion is feeling hungry, it kills deer. Lion is not good, as well as lion is not doing bad. In a natural way, it is filling its stomach, if we dare to define it’s good or bad then that is our foolishness. According to situation good turns into bad, as well as bad turns into good. If we think lion’s point of view, lion is not doing bad, in other way, if we think in the point of deer, lion is doing bad. So our presence of state of situation gives different definitions to good and bad. Our steps to define good or bad is foolishness.
Killing virus in my body is good for me. But killing a living being is bad for virus. Shall I do good or bad?
Shall I die with virus, or shall I kill virus? In fact, who am I to define good or bad? But my foolishness is, having this small mind, thinking of ‘everything is known to me’ leads me to define every thing. But this mind is minute thing in this world to understand world, but it thinks it is supreme power in this world. That is my ill fate.
Now I have to come out of a state of having good or bad. I have to make my understandings to be far away from good and bad. I have kill a ‘ thought ‘ good or bad. Every action of mine has to be true in the process of nature. That natural process does not know either good or bad.
| Be first to comment on this Article!
| |
|
|
|
 |
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
