|
|
|
|
Articles: Devotion | Archeological Evidence
- Mrs. Sravani Suresh Anand
| |
Archeological Evidence - II
Some more evidences to prove the historical accuracy of the Bible. While archaeology can not prove that the Bible is inspired and revealed by God, it can prove the historical accuracy and trustworthiness of that which is recorded in its pages. As many false religions support their beliefs by pointing to a Bible full of errors and mistranslations, there is plenty of archaeological evidence to support the historical accuracy of the Bible we read today. For those who are unwilling to believe God's words when he promised to preserve His Word (Matthew 24:35), and for those interested in contending for their faith, we will examine here some of the Archaeological evidence for the Bible.
*Source:http://www.contenderministries.org/biblestudy/archeology.php#blackstele)
The Black Stele
David's Conquest of Jerusalem
The Ebla Tablets
The Black Stele
For many years, 'higher critics' of the Bible postulated that the first five books of the Bible, known as the Pentateuch, could not have been written by Moses - despite the fact that the books themselves say that they were authored by him. This idea came to be know as the 'Documentary Hypothesis,' and was commonly taught in most religion courses in Western universities.
The proponents of this idea held that writing was not even in existence at the time of Moses, therefore it had to have been of later authorship. The minds of these critics went to work, and they devised a great structure of Old Testament criticism based on this premise - concluding that the books were written by several different authors.
| Be first to comment on this Article!
| |
|
|
|
 |
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
