Discussion on Current 'Affairs' in General Forum at TeluguPeople.com

aaDavaaLLa hakkulani vaaru enduku sariggaa vinayOginchukOlEru?

Better keep it from where it was !

Posted by: Mr. M Kumar N At: 19, Dec 2005 10:23:40 PM IST

You know it was ! Then look for suitable place.

Posted by: Mr. M Kumar N At: 19, Dec 2005 10:22:14 PM IST

Thanx for joining us in dumping the Rubbish Madhu :)) Help us out!

Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 19, Dec 2005 10:11:04 PM IST

Who is dumping this rubbish ? By god is it not the same person who originated this thread !

Posted by: Mr. M Kumar N At: 19, Dec 2005 10:06:34 PM IST

In these guide lines the Supreme Court observed that reservations should not exceed 50%.While so NTR has hiked the reservations to more than 50%.Hence the AP High Court has struck down the G.O. _____________________________________________ Correct, this proves that the Govt is not always correct! --------------------------------------------- We can not say that the reservation products are the "good for nothing women".It is like you saying that THE OLYMPICS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED FOR MEN AND WOMEN JOINTLY. _____________________________________________ NO, What I am saying is that one or more of the Medals should not be reserved for the women in a common race jsut because they are not competent enough. (You create a separate race for women and do whatever you want .. btu if you declare somethign as a common race between men and women .. then dont reserve any medals for women) --------------------------------------------- I am once again saying that the Constitution of India is being amended to renew the reservations for the Lok Sabha and Assembly Seats and NOT FOR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS OR EMPLOYMENT _____________________________________________ How sure are you about it?

Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 19, Dec 2005 9:55:43 PM IST

//The constitution has provided the reservations only for a specific period of time and not indefinitely and the constituion is being amended every time to keep the vote banks intact.// ______________________________ I am once again saying that the Constitution of India is being amended to renew the reservations for the Lok Sabha and Assembly Seats and NOT FOR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS OR EMPLOYMENT. If you say that the above amendment is for keeping the vote banks intact, by now several people could have approached the Supreme Court.Why were these not struck down by the Supreme Court? ---------------------------------- //Well what I mean to say was that there were umpteen istances where the courts have struck down reservation rules .. for instace when NTR proposed to hike the reservations .. the AP high court came down strongly .. and the Govt had to withdraw the hike .. IF THE GOVT WAS RIGHT, WHY DID THE COURT STRIKE THE ORDER DOWN ..?? newayz my point here was that Just Because the Govt does something it is not mnandatory that it should be correct! // ____________________________ The Supreme Court has laid down the guide lines to the governments in respect of reservations for educational institutions.In these guide lines the Supreme Court observed that reservations should not exceed 50%.While so NTR has hiked the reservations to more than 50%.Hence the AP High Court has struck down the G.O. Though the Courts have been striking down the various Government Orders in respect of reservations, they were not being struck down COMPLETELY by the Courts.Why?Because Courts feel that reservations completely are not bad. ------------------------------- //Not at one stage, I still say that the prducts of womens reservations are "good for nothing women" // ________________________________ More or less 50% of the population is women.We should see that women also get equal oppurtunities.Because of the orthodox back ground women are lagging behind, hence reservations. We can not say that the reservation products are the "good for nothing women".It is like you saying that THE OLYMPICS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED FOR MEN AND WOMEN JOINTLY.

Posted by: Brenda James At: 19, Dec 2005 9:43:57 PM IST

The provisions pertaining to reservations for the Lok Sabha and Assembly Seats have been renewed by way of amendment and not the provisions of reservations in educational institutions and employment.So far there is no provision of reservations in educational institutions and employment in the Constitution of India. _____________________________________________ The constitution has provided the reservations only for a specific period of time and not indefinitely and the constituion is being amended every time to keep the vote banks intact. If the courts have struck down the reservations rules then why will there be any reservations now and why will there be grieviences? ____________________________________________ Well what I mean to say was that there were umpteen istances where the courts have struck down reservation rules .. for instace when NTR proposed to hike the reservations .. the AP high court came down strongly .. and the Govt had to withdraw the hike .. IF THE GOVT WAS RIGHT, WHY DID THE COURT STRIKE THE ORDER DOWN ..?? newayz my point here was that Just Because the Govt does something it is not mnandatory that it should be correct!

Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 19, Dec 2005 6:30:48 PM IST

//The provisions are amended atleast a dozen times so far and the courts have struck down the reservation rules atleast 5-6 times (including the latest judgement about private colleges) Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 19, Dec 2005 2:57:07 PM IST// ____________________________________ The provisions pertaining to reservations for the Lok Sabha and Assembly Seats have been renewed by way of amendment and not the provisions of reservations in educational institutions and employment.So far there is no provision of reservations in educational institutions and employment in the Constitution of India. If the courts have struck down the reservations rules then why will there be any reservations now and why will there be grieviences? The recent judgment of the Supreme Court regarding Private Colleges is not exactly what you say.The Private Colleges Association have approached the Supreme Court challenging the Rules of reservations. The Supreme Court observed that in the absence of reservations provided in the Constitution of India, the authorities cannot follow the Executive Rules.Hence the government have decided to amend the Constitution itself.

Posted by: Brenda James At: 19, Dec 2005 6:16:23 PM IST

Hehe Leetrhy, I am not tired .. twas jsut that my internet line was down. I aint gonna gove up so soon. Lets see how long this thing goes :))

Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 19, Dec 2005 3:59:29 PM IST

How many times the provisions of reservations are ammended in the Constitution of India? How many times the Courts have struck down the reservations rule? _____________________________________________ The provisions are amended atleast a dozen times so far and the courts have struck down the reservation rules atleast 5-6 times (including the latest judgement about private colleges)

Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 19, Dec 2005 3:57:07 PM IST

< < Previous Page: 10 of 25 Next > >