|
|
|
General Forum: Current 'Affairs' | | ? asalEm jarugutunnadi ? | |
| They are not able to provide time but they are puttingin Extra Hours to cope up with the additional burden!
Exactly ! As the doctors are fighting for justice with govt. I too am showing my opposition towards their withdrawal duties.
___________________________________________
Back to Square 1 - When didnt withdraw from the duties in 2006, nothing had happened .. so they have withdrawn now ..
If the Govt has shown the alternatives, Yet the Children are dying then is it the fault of Jr Doctors?
Posted by: chitti At: 9, Dec 2007 5:31:03 AM IST
____________________________________________
pillala mIDA zaali kanna DAkTarla mIda vyatirEkatE ekkuva!
And I am exactly talking about that -
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 9, Dec 2007 5:31:18 AM IST
If the Jr Doctors are not available, Sr Doctors will have to put in extra hours to conduct the operations and they are already doing it! The Sr. Doctors are filling up all the gaps caused due to the absence of the Junior doctors.
Unofficial records say that more than 1000 children died at Niloufer in 2006. Even if you look at Media reports now, they say
"28 CHILDREN DIED **** SINCE THE STRIKE ****" BUT THEY ARE NOT SAYING
"28 CHILDREN DIED **** DUE TO THE STRIKE ****"
And again there is a lot of difference in the meaning!
The primary responsibility of the Junior Doctors is not to save the lives - it is to provide support to sernior doctors in saving the lives ...
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 9, Dec 2007 5:22:05 AM IST
If the Jr Doctors are not available, Sr Doctors will have to put in extra hours to conduct the operations and they are already doing it! The Sr. Doctors are filling up all the gaps caused due to the absence of the Junior doctors.
Unofficial records say that more than 1000 children died at Niloufer in 2006. Even if you look at Media reports now, they say
"28 CHILDREN DIED **** SINCE THE STRIKE ****" BUT THEY ARE NOT SAYING
"28 CHILDREN DIED **** DUE TO THE STRIKE ****"
And again there is a lot of difference in the meaning!
The primary responsibility of the Junior Doctors is not to save the lives - it is to provide support to sernior doctors in saving the lives ...
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 9, Dec 2007 5:17:58 AM IST
me too have it and so for children
__________________________________________
You didnt take the side of the Children - You took the side AGAINST THE DOCTORS .. your intention was more to malign the Doctors than to symnpathize with the children!
If the concern was about the Children, you would have blamed the Govt "ALSO" for not providing alternatives to treat the children
and you would have blamed the MLA "also" ... your focus on just the Doctors, WHO ARE NOT USUALLY INVOLVED FULLY IN THE CRITICAL EMERGENCY OPERATIONS, clearly says that the bias is agains the Junior Doctors!
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 9, Dec 2007 5:16:34 AM IST
junaid ki maddatu gaa anTE asalu vaadanE lEdu - mIru annadi "pEshanT ku maddatu gaa" ani! There is a lot of difference between the two, for Juniad was an aggressor and not the patient!
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 9, Dec 2007 5:06:08 AM IST
Posted by: chitti At: 9, Dec 2007 5:01:49 AM IST
____________________________________________
DAkTarlenduku samme chEstunnarO telisi kUDA mIru maLLI maLLI rOzu poddunnE oka mEsEJ peTTaTlEDA ( Blaming only them for the deaths ) - idi kUDA alaanTIdE
You refuse to post anything about the MLA because of obvious reasons and I am pointing to the same again and again!
You are talking about Doctors's indifference again and again and I am talkign about your bias again and again!
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 9, Dec 2007 5:03:28 AM IST
Posted by: chitti At: 9, Dec 2007 4:56:44 AM IST
--------------------------------------------
Lemme repeat - It's not difficult to understand the implicit meaning of the message - It clearly means Afsar was not at fault when he went to support the patient - Moreover, he didnt go in support of the patient .. He went to ask the Doctors to withdraw the case!
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 9, Dec 2007 5:02:11 AM IST
Posted by: chitti At: 6, Dec 2007 2:59:24 AM IST ---- page 18
Posted by: chitti At: 9, Dec 2007 5:01:49 AM IST
____________________________________________
DAkTarlenduku samme chEstunnarO telisi kUDA mIru mallI mallI rOzu poddunnE oka mEsEJ peTTaTlEDA ( Blaming only them for the deaths ) - idi kUDA alaanTIdE
You refuse to post anything about the MLA because of obvious reasons and I am pointing to the same again and again!
You are talking about Doctors's indifference again and again and I am talkign about your bias again and again!
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 9, Dec 2007 5:01:45 AM IST
Posted by: chitti At: 9, Dec 2007 4:56:44 AM IST
--------------------------------------------
Lemme repeat - It's not difficult to understand the implicit meaning of the message - It clearly means Afsar was not at fault when he went to support the patient - Moreover, he didnt go in support of the patient .. He went to ask the Doctors to withdraw the case!
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 9, Dec 2007 5:00:22 AM IST
Posted by: chitti At: 9, Dec 2007 4:54:17 AM IST
____________________________________________
By the same Logic, I misunderstood the message when yuou said investment --
akkaDa clariTI lEkapOvaTam valla nEnu kUDA unnantamEranE abhipraayapaDavalasi vachchindi
adI naa vishayam !
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 9, Dec 2007 4:56:47 AM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
