|
|
|
General Forum: Current 'Affairs' | | spandinchanDi....spandana avasaramu.... | |
| we need*
Posted by: Saleem At: 7, Apr 2004 8:58:35 AM IST
Oh Thanks KiRan garu :) The books I gave the reference said that. I guess we deatiled research !
Posted by: Saleem At: 7, Apr 2004 8:58:01 AM IST
Anupama garu You missed a connection there. Vedic sects at that time supported animal sacrfice and they wanted it to cotinue. But buddha was going aginst them and he gained so many followers and vedic rituals were losing hold in the masses. By that story of agni puraaNa, they wanted to establish animal sacrifice was great. So vishNu in budda avataara, did this sort of negative campaign so that demons would follow budda, would lose thier energy. Thats that part of story.
But again according to many it was Sankaracharya who introduced budda into dasavataara. Becuase Buddism and sankarcharyas advaitam has some basic principles in common and also he wanted to stop conversions from hinduism to buddism. Some say its jayadEva, who introduced him into dasavataras through his astapadis or ekadasapadis. Still some Orthodox hindu school do not consider budda as part of dasavataaraas.
Posted by: Saleem At: 7, Apr 2004 7:20:41 AM IST
What happened?topic diverted from Raamayanam to Bhagavatam.None here clarified the topic in Raamayana (one chapter in Bhagavatam),but started conversation on Bhagavatam.Good.Keep going.
Posted by: Mr. Sarma DLN At: 6, Apr 2004 10:24:30 PM IST
Anupama garu,
meerannadi naku artham kaaledu. meeru cheppindi buddudu enduku vedic rituals ni nammavaddannaado. nenu cheppina agni puraana katha, DasavataarallO buddudi ki ela chotu kalpinchaaro :)
Posted by: Saleem At: 6, Apr 2004 10:01:15 PM IST
Anupama garu,
Briefly, as far as I know, buddas influence was very much in that time. He started teaching against vaidika karmakaanDaas at that time. So many people and kings came under his ifluence and started taking budhism. Because of this popularity they have inlcuded budda into dasavataaraas. Probably you can find many references. I will try and see if i can give any. I would like if anyone correct me .
Posted by: Saleem At: 6, Apr 2004 8:18:25 PM IST
Lot of people hr are saying that ,in present situation there are no "men" like "Rama" and no women like "Sita"..then , that means noone is taking the positive aspects of Ramayana,right?
then what is the use of it ,if nobody is following the good things in it? Is it just limited for reading and considering as "Pavitra grantham"?
Posted by: విజయ్ At: 6, Apr 2004 8:07:42 PM IST
Forgot
For reference hindoomatam - hindoodharma vivaaha paddhati by RVR !and
"meepErEmiTi" story by gurajaaDa.
I appologise if its not in the scope of discussion here.
Posted by: Saleem At: 6, Apr 2004 8:06:49 PM IST
May be it is beacuse of popularity budda got those days. prati daannee aShTaadaSa puraaNaallO kanipeTTi pracharam chEyaDam mana aanavaayitee kadaa.
They have this story of buddha in agnipuraaNa.
"dEvatalu dEvaasura yuddamlO ODipOyi, vishNu moorti daggiraki veLLi morapeTTukunnaaraTa. appuDu vishNumoorti SuddhOdhanuni kumaaruDi gaa avatarinchaaDaaniki vappukunnaaTTa. ala budduDi avataraam etti vEdalani nammavaddani asuralaki baaga bOdhinchaaDaTa. asurulu vEdaalani nammaDam maaneyyagaanE, Sakti pOyi voDipOyaaru."
Posted by: Saleem At: 6, Apr 2004 7:59:52 PM IST
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspati Velavartipati At: 6, Apr 2004 9:07:17 PM IST
Topic diverted to ---,its better to cut this thread...where is censor mems...what r u doing...cut this thread
Posted by: Mrs. Sneha sarma At: 6, Apr 2004 7:49:30 PM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
