|
|
|
General Forum: Govt. and Politics | | Restore Telugu Pride | |
| claps claps @ nmk and saila
Posted by: Mr. Subhash S At: 31, Jul 2004 7:14:05 PM IST
Claps @nmk
Posted by: Mrs. Saila Sarigala At: 31, Jul 2004 7:12:39 PM IST
I think you lost direction; I don;t how as a self you are going to restore Inited AP pride; You are teying to tell something happened in the past which we ( Telugu People) don't have any record.
Sri Sri gari joke:
Tamilians argued that Tirpathi is part of TN as the name suggests Thiru a tamil word; Then our people argued our landmark is upto Sri Ranga Patnam as the name Sri suggests Telugu words.
Pudina: This you will find minimum five languages.
Coming to the subject in Amravathi ( Don't confuse keep Atlas always with you) near Guntur there are some ruins of back dated. Who built , why they built no one knows.
1. Do you want to rebuild these sinece they are in ourland.
2. Do you claim we havew constructed those?
3. If you reclaim you will do it only for AP , India or whole world.
4. When Buddha statue bombarded by Afghans any one felt it's our pride?
History was diverted somewhere for some reason; If you go back it's nothing but abusing ourselves rather than striving for a united Telugu community.
There is always a room to do Now.
Posted by: Mr. M Kumar N At: 31, Jul 2004 7:08:47 PM IST
Hmm.. Is an "English Speaking Person" White or Black? Hint: All americans speak Enlgish.
Were "Aryans" were any different?
Posted by: Mr. Aditya Vedula At: 31, Jul 2004 6:20:06 AM IST
1. When America , Africa, Europe, Asia and Australia are intact ( look continent evolution in any ATLAS or website) who migrated from where to where?
2. The very first statement confirms that howmuch confusion there was regarding fairness?
3. How does a color fairness is compared to Indians;
4. Aryans are fair in color are whites?
Aryans were compared with the africans not with the Indians are Dravidians;
Posted by: Mr. M Kumar N At: 29, Jul 2004 10:00:46 PM IST
The factual correctness of religious literature is not my concern - like when and how long did Lord Rama rule. That is exactly what it is - religious literature. I don't confuse it with factual history until proven otherwise. However, Mr.Vachaspati's claim that Vedic gods were not worshipped in India until 183 B.C is demonstrably false and a despicable lie.
Bahudoorapu, you are right, and I am NOT keen on starting an argument with someone like Mr.Vachaspati who bears ideological hatred to Hinduism and Hindu traditions, but am I to take it that people like him can speak whatever they want with scant respect for truth and other's beliefs?
Posted by: Mr. Aditya Vedula At: 29, Jul 2004 5:27:48 AM IST
porapaaTuna 200 badulu 2000 paDindi. 200 ani chaduvukOpraarthana
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 28, Jul 2004 10:51:07 AM IST
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 24, Jul 2004 10:03:46 PM IST
//The first evidence of Vedic worship in India is first seen in the Sunga Dynasty in 183 BC. The Vedas existed in some oral form and were written only after 2nd c AD since Sanskrit did not exist before that.//
vaachaspati gaaruu,
manakharma koddI manavaaLLu charitra raasipeTTaalani anukOlEdu. kaabaTTi vidESIyulu vraasina charitralanEchadavaDam mana daurbhaagyam. mahAbhaaratam , SrIkRushNunicharitra sumaaru 5000 vEla samvatsaraala krindaTa jariginavi. vITi gaNana manapanchaangaalalO chuuDavachchu.
appuDE SrIkRushNuDu bhagavadgItalO
'Evam paramparaapraaptamimam raajarshayO vidu@h
sa kaalEnEhamahataa yOgOnashTa@h parantapa
mariyu
sa yEvaayam mayaatEdya yOga@h prOkta@h puraatana@h
bhaktOsi mE sakhaa chEti rahasyam hyEtaduttamam
ani cheppaaru. anTE SrIkRushNunikanTE mundE I yOgam vundani. inkaa manuvu ikvaakulanunchi vastunnadani. vEdamulu apaurushEyamulu. okaLLanunDi vErokaLLaki
vraata muulakangaakaaka nOTitOvallEvEyinchEvaaru. antEgaani mIrudaharinchinaTLu samskRuta bhaasha krI. Sa. 2000 samvatsaramu nunDi vunnadi anuTa chaalaa tappu. appaTikE yajNjayaagaadulu chEsEvaarani vundi kadaa. andukani vaidika saampradaayamu puraatanamainadi. adE kaakunDaa ippaTi charitraakaarulu(vidESIyulu) hinduu dESamlO naagarikata vunDinappuDu prapancham lO ekkaDaa kooDaa anta naagarikata lEdani oppukonnaaru.
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 28, Jul 2004 10:48:31 AM IST
rEy kondaru jIvulaki ikkaDa bhalE mAnChi fAlOying undi rA. ninnu anavasarangA dummetti pOstAru prajalu, A jIvulni tiTTAvanTE. kondaru jIvulunTAru, vitanDa vAdam chEsi tama goppa chUpinchukOvAlanE panikimAlina dhOraNilO unDEvALLu. hinduvulanu tiTTi mainAriTIla maddatu sampAdinchukOvAlanE kuhanA jIvulu vAru. vALLatO vEgalEkE, nEnu vadilESA. jAgrattarOy AdityA!
Posted by: Bahud♥♥rapu Baatasaari At: 28, Jul 2004 9:20:56 AM IST
I am sorry folks, but Mr.Vachaspati is the kind of scholar our universities seem to be producing. They teach that so-called Aryans were foreigners and invaded and destroyed Indian civilization but the Mughals and their central asian predecessors were noble and brave warriors that brought great culture to India. This is the sad, sad situation.
This discussion begs the question: How can we restore Telugu Pride if we can not respect and accept our own history?
Posted by: Mr. Aditya Vedula At: 28, Jul 2004 4:18:01 AM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
