|
|
|
General Forum: Religion | | aadhyaatmika praSnalu | |
| ikkaDa 'okaTe' aMTE "aMdaru samaanamEnani" bhaavana.aMdarilOnu uMDE deivatvamu okaTE nani.alaaanipiMchinappuDu okaru goppa okaru takkuva,okaru hInamu okaru hechchu ani bhaavana raadu.manamaMtaa okaTE anna bhaavanalO okari tappuoppulu okaru arthamuchEsukoni,sarichEsukonE ,okari edugudalaki okaru tODpaDE,avakaaSamu ekkuva uMTuMdi .adE "tEDaa" chUpistE manassullO okaripaTla okariki vyatirEkata perigi "SaaMti"ni kOlipOtaamu. aMdukE work is divine annaru adi paachipaneinaa lEka kurchilOkUrchunEpaneinaa pani panE.evariki vachchina pani vaaru chEsukoni
okarini okaru gauravamutO chUstaamanE bhaavana talettaali.adE samaanatvamu.I samaanatvamulO "SaaMtini"poMdutaamu.
E dEvuLLu
goppa ,maa dEvuDu goppa ane taaratamyamu chUsEvaaLLu oka kUlivaanilOni "chamaTa" viluva arthamuchEsukonagalamaa?matamu pErutO oka manishi chaMpi aa 'aakramdanu 'arthamuchEsukOgalamaa?'dEvuLLu varaalichchE vaaLLu' anE concept kaligina vaaLLamu "deivatvamu" aMTE artha elaa telustuMdi?vEmana gaari padyamu okaTi ---daridruni iMTa, braahmanuni iMTa varshamu okElaagE kurustuMdi.daaniki taaratamyamu telIdu.
ilaa sahakariMchi arthamuchEsukone vaaDE deivatvaaniki daggaravaaDu.deivatvamu,vaaTi viluva vadilivEyaMDi kanIsamu manavataa viluvalanu telInavaaLLeinaamu.That is the pity
Posted by: Mrs. shaloo At: 2, Mar 2006 12:17:16 PM IST
Posted by: Keerty At: 2, Mar 2006 10:27:32 AM IST
alaanTi puraaNaalu mIlaanTi vaaLLakOsamE rachimpa baDDaayi. daanini nEnEmI vishNuparamgaa artham chEyanakkara lEdu. ajNja janula mOHanaarthamE avi vraaya baDi yunnavi.
'Esha mOham sRujamyaaSu yOjanaanmOhayishyati
tvam cha rudra mahAbAhO mOhaSaastraaNi kaaraya
atathyaani vitathyaani darSayasva mahAbhuja
prakaaSam kuru chaatmaanamaprakaaSam cha maam kuru' .... varaaha puraaNam
'Svapachaadapi kashTatvam brahmESaanaadaya@h suraa
tadaivaachyuta yaan~tyEva yadaiva tvam paraaNgmuKa@h' ... Saiva mariyu skanda puraaNamulu
naaham na cha SivOnyE cha tachChaktyEmkaamSa bhaagina@h
baala@h krIDanakairyadvatkrIDatEsmaabhirachyuta@h '
... brahma mariyu brahma vaivarta puraaNamulu
muKyamaina paayinTu EmiTO?
sagam sagam ( mIkanukoolamainavi) pOshTu cheyyaDam mIkE chellindi. akkaDa mottam ikkaDa vunchaanu chaduvukOvachchu.
Lingaraja now turned the point towards Lord Narasimha. He started telling that Lord Narasimha was defeated by Sri Veera Bhadra. Sri Vijayîndra Tîrtha criticized this by stateing that the information about Lord Narasimha being defeated by Lord Veera Bhadra is in Skaanda Puraana. Skaanda puraana is Thamasik and hence cannot be taken as a proof. Sri Vijayîndra Tîrtha very cleverly solved this point by quoteing that in Shaiva puraana, it is mentioned that Lord Rudra in the form of Sharabha defeats Lord Narasimha. But, in Skaanda puraana, it is mentioned that Lord Veera Bhadra defeats Lord Narasimha. So, who defeated Lord Narasimha? Is it Lord Rudra or Lord Veera Bhadra? If you say it is Lord Rudra then, it is against Shaiva puraana. If you say it is Lord Rudra then it is against Skaanda Puraana. Lingaraja's argument was based on the Thamasa puranas and Sri Vijayîndra Tîrtha created a suspision in Lingaraja's argument. Lingaraja became so confused and all the people who were watching the argument were amazed at the way Sri Vijayîndra Tiirtha disproved Lingaraja's point by creating this suspision. Sri Vijayîndra Tîrtha continued further and said that the authentic information is only in Saatvika puranas and since Lingaraja's point is based on Thamasik puranaas which is against various Shrutis, Smrutis and Saatvika puranas, it is a bluder to tell that Lord Narasimha was defeated by Lord Rudra or Lord Veera Bhadra. Sri Vijayîndra Tîrtha described Lord Narasimha as 'Narasimhasya KaeValam Jyothireka ManaaDyantam' which means that Lord Narasimha is Infinite and who has no destruction. For the one who is infinite and who is undestructable, how can it have an end? So, as mentioned in the Saatvika puranas, Lord Narasimha destroyed Sharabha. Sri Vijayîndra Tîrtha gave one more proof from a Shruthi as 'Harim Harantha Manuyanthi VishVasyeeShaanam VrushaBham Matheenaam' which means that Lord Rudra who is praised by 'Eeshaana' word was destroyed by Lord Hari(i.e. Lord Narasimha). Also, the Smruthi states that
BramhaanaMindram RudramCha Yamam Varunamaevacha| Nihasya Harathe YasmaaThasMyaaDharereHoochayathe||
Which means that Lord Bramha, Lord Indra, Lord Rudra, Lord Yama, Lord Varuna get destroyed by Lord Hari (i.e. Lord Narasimha) during the Pralaya period. This means that Lord Hari is the supreme(Sarvothamma), Lord Hari is the creator, Protector and destroyer of these worlds, Lord Hari is the ParaBramha as mentioned in the Vedas, Shrutis, Smrutis and Puraanas
bhagavantuDaina vishNuvu andarilO vunDaDam valana andaruu vishNuvulavaru.
vishNuvokkaDE svatantrya tatvamu. migataavaaru antaa asvatantryulE. vishNuvu lEka pOtE aajIvi chEtanatvam vunDadu. vishNuvutOpaaTu muKyapraaNadEvuDu kooDaa.
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 2, Mar 2006 12:00:46 PM IST
Posted by: K Sai Kiran Kumar At: 1, Mar 2006 11:55:59 AM IST
rudraantargata nRusimha svaami anTE rudruni hRudayamulO nunna nRusimha svaami ani
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 1, Mar 2006 4:36:25 PM IST
naa uddESyamulO jNjaanamaMTE vishNumUrti sarvOttamuDaa, allaaH sarvOttamuDaa,SaMkaruDu sarvOttamuDaa ani telusukOvaTamu kaadu
Real knowledge is
The God in you is the God in all.It is all one.Oneness.
And if you understand this, you will never question "Which God?"
Posted by: Mrs. shaloo At: 1, Mar 2006 12:10:56 PM IST
Posted by: K Sai Kiran Kumar At: 9, Feb 2006 5:20:13 PM IST
SrIkRushNuDu, bhImuDu mariyu arjunuDuu veLLi jaraasandhunitO malla yuddham apEkshistaaru. evaritOnainaa sarE. kaani jaraasandhuDu bhImuDinE ennukunTaaDu. hari sankalpamunDagaa evaraina nEmi?
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 1, Mar 2006 11:21:05 AM IST
Posted by: Keerty At: 28, Feb 2006 7:18:41 PM IST
cheppaDam marichaa SivaraatrinaaDu Sivuniki abhishEkam chEyinchaanu. panchaaksharI japam chEsi rudraantargata nRusimha dEvuniki arpinchaanu
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 1, Mar 2006 10:55:40 AM IST
Posted by: Keerty At: 28, Feb 2006 7:18:41 PM IST
paddaalakI naa venaka paDutunnaarenduku? nEnu 26 na aafIsuki Salavu kaabaTTI raalEdu. mIru nannu katha cheppamannadi chuuDa lEdu. aa taruvaata SaastrigaarE katha pOshTu chEsaaru chadava mannaaru chadivaanu. daaniki pramaaNamEkaadu aakatha kooDaa ippuDE vinTunnaanu. mIkEmannaa pramaaNam telistE cheppanDi. manalO mana maaTa mIru aamrapaali gaaraa? EdO richi anTuuvunTE anumaanam vastOndi. antE kaadu ilaa katha cheppamani pIkku tinTU vunTE kooDaa anumaanam balapaDutOndi.
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 1, Mar 2006 10:52:33 AM IST
Posted by: sowjanya sowjanya At: 28, Feb 2006 3:13:45 PM IST
swargaM narakaM guRiMchi nEnu analEdu. I think keerthyji made it a point.
And coming to the point " viparIta jNjaanamu " valana kaadu nasHTapOyinadi.
jNjaanamu valana evvarU nashTapOru,aMdhakaaramulOki veLLaru.EdO naaku,( ahaM ) vachchEsiMdi anE "ahaMkaaramu" tO manishi / daanavuDu a saMpaadiMchina jNjaanaanni durupayOgamu chEstaaDu, nashTapOtaaDu. so while gaining knowledge one should be balanced in mind.
bhagavamtuDu "stitaprajNjuDu".Ayana durupayOgamu chEstE "bhagavaMtuDu elaa avutaaDu"
Posted by: Mrs. shaloo At: 1, Mar 2006 10:35:36 AM IST
Amarapali aunty dont hate Murthy uncle.Come with ur own id.
Posted by: Miss Richy Richa At: 28, Feb 2006 9:21:55 PM IST
hiraNya
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 28, Feb 2006 3:28:51 PM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
