|
|
|
General Forum: Govt. and Politics | | Restore Telugu Pride | |
| Arabic and Urdu scripts are much similar but they mean entirely different;
F A C T
--------
If the Arabic script is made topple down it just reads like Telugu language.
Any arabic script of mainly nouns ( because they won't change much when you pronounce)can be read if you put just upside down.
I don't know about Urdu but who can read and write Urdu can confirm it.
Posted by: Mr. M Kumar N At: 24, Jul 2004 6:28:27 PM IST
trilinga dESamlO maaTlaaDEdi telugu bhaasha . daakshaaraamam , SrISailamu, SrI kaaLahasti I mooDuu trilingaalu.
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 24, Jul 2004 11:26:56 AM IST
///As for the influence of Buddhist Prakrit on Telugu, let me correct myself - may I say "proto-Telugu"? I concede that Telugu as we know it today may not have existed then.
...It can't be even Pro-Telugu, may be proto-Andhra. Telugu is mixture of some Sanskrit words, some Andhra Words and some Prakrit words....and may be some Hindu words too now a days!
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 24, Jul 2004 11:17:24 AM IST
Adityaji,
//You say: "Aryan migration occured not at single instance, but by series of waves. Later Aryans defeated the Earliar Aryans, when they were migrating". Let me congratulate you. You just solved one of the biggest puzzles of Indian History. If you add some references to the research on which you based the above conclusion, you will surely win an award for a breakthrough Historical discovery.
..Any History book or NCERT book may be a witness. And the Presence of Dasas (not Dasyus) in the Rig Veda proves...that Dasas earlier defeated Aryans.
//However, we are still in the dark as to how the Hittites are even remotely connected to "Aryan Migration"! Kindly don't make me dig up information on Hittites and post it in this discussion board. The identity of Hittites is completely irrelevant to "Restoring Telugu Pride.
...Yes. here the discussion about Hettites is irrelevant in Restoring the Telugu Pride. But since the discussion slipped into the Classification of Languages, it went in that direction.
...But the study of Aryans are per the available resources, proves, the Southern Russian region was their home. This is accepted now. Even Trojons of Greek were said to be Aryans. I suggest you please refer 'Glimpses of World History' by Jawaharlal Nehru. For Official Authentication by Government of India's ASI, please hit the following URLs:
http://www.harappa.com/script/maha2.html
It says, "So far as the Indus Civilization is concerned the main implication of the new theory seems to be that the Aryan-Dasa conflict recorded in the earliest portions of the Rigveda is the story of the hostilities and eventual fusion of two Aryan tribes, which took place before their entry into the Indian sub-continent and has thus no relevance to the demise of the mature phase of the Indus Civilization. "...It is the evidence that Aryans migrated to several places in waves.
Regarding Hettites, if you are arguing with confidence, I refer again! I request U that U too probe the matter.
But Adityaji...
May be, it was Indo-Aryans defeated Hettites, who were earliest migrant Aryans to that Area, because during those days, the almost the total Europe leaving the preseitn U.K., was covered by Aryan Activity.
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 24, Jul 2004 11:13:31 AM IST
Mr.Vachaspati,
I apologize, but this discussion is getting a little tiresome.
You say: "Aryan migration occured not at single instance, but by series of waves. Later Aryans defeated the Earliar Aryans, when they were migrating". Let me congratulate you. You just solved one of the biggest puzzles of Indian History. If you add some references to the research on which you based the above conclusion, you will surely win an award for a breakthrough Historical discovery. However, we are still in the dark as to how the Hittites are even remotely connected to "Aryan Migration"! Kindly don't make me dig up information on Hittites and post it in this discussion board. The identity of Hittites is completely irrelevant to "Restoring Telugu Pride".
As for the influence of Buddhist Prakrit on Telugu, let me correct myself - may I say "proto-Telugu"? I concede that Telugu as we know it today may not have existed then.
Posted by: Mr. Aditya Vedula At: 24, Jul 2004 9:25:50 AM IST
Aryan migratio do not support the geographycal conditions that time.
When there is no europe where is the question of migration?
The discussion is just based on the visitors comments which were made a few thousand years ago. That period there is no idea about earth surface development.
They produced some fiction not the facts.
Posted by: Mr. M Kumar N At: 23, Jul 2004 2:12:03 PM IST
Adityaji...
Aryan migration occured not at single instance, but by series of waves. Later Aryans defeated the Earliar Aryans, when they were migrating. Please once again check the information regarding Hettites.
//As for Telugu and Prakrit, if you read my earlier posts in this topic, you simply repeated what I had already said. In fact, Prakrit may have initiated the "Sanskritization" of Telugu starting with Buddhist influence from before the Classical Hindu kingdoms starting with the Saatavahanas.
...Impossible. There was no Telugu during Satavahana. This opinion has no historical relevance. It's false. If tamil is older, then evolved Kannada, and Malayalam and telugu developed almost parallely. Kannada is older than Telugu (approximately a century). In fact, Telugu is different from 'Andhra'. Telugu is mixture all the dialects and developed like a lingua-franka when all the telugus were united for the first time, during Kakatiyas.
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 23, Jul 2004 10:06:57 AM IST
manushulu kAka pOTe...
computer mundu evarainA...kUrchOgalarA !
Can any animal browze in the Internet?
ayinA manishinu paTTukuni...manishagA chUDAlEnanTavEmiTayyA bAbU...
tamarini edurkOvAlanTE...
chAlA suluvani tamari spandanalE chebutunnayi mari!
bhAshA kuTumbAla gurinchi inta pedda vislEshaNa jarugutuntE...telugu bhAsha nA mAtru bhAsha ani cheppukunTu....palgOkunDA...'nItO' nAkanavasaram anE I peDavAdam....EmiTi....viDDUram kAkapOtE!
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 23, Jul 2004 10:00:24 AM IST
Is there any posibility that either Tamil or Sanskrit are derived from Telugu?
1. Pentium I= Telugu
2. Pentium II= Tamil
3. Pentium III= Kannada
4. Pentium IV = Malayalam
5. Pentium V = Sanskrit
Posted by: Mr. M Kumar N At: 23, Jul 2004 1:46:45 AM IST
Hmmm... good theory. May be, I can agree with that... that language and thoughts are inter-linked. As per that theory, to any one who believes it, I want to say some thing. Tamilians and Andhraites never had similar thoughts. Hence, Tamil and Telugu cannot be related. If Tamil belongs to Dravidian group, then Telugu doesn't. I don't understand one thing... why you guys want to link Telugu to Tamil(while Tamil belongs to Dravidian group of language or the first Dravidian language)? What makes you fun and happy about it?
nItO nAkEmI pani lEdu, nItO vAdinchE Opika lEdu ani nettI nOrU koTTukuni cheppinA, inkA nannu paTTukuni mari enduku ChAvagoDutunnaTTu? nI pAtikELLa chaduvulO adE nErpitE, nA aidELLa chaduvulO adE nErpinaTTu. nEnAlreDI cheppA, ninnO manishigAnE chUDaTam danDaga ani. mari nannenudku kelukkunTAvu? elA chebitE nuvvinTAvu?
Posted by: Bahud♥♥rapu Baatasaari At: 22, Jul 2004 9:21:44 AM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
