|
|
|
General Forum: Religion | | Atma Bhasha..... | |
| Speaking in silence?
Posted by: Mr. jogarao pilla At: 18, Sep 2003 10:19:46 AM IST
If while in body u try to elevate urself from the present level of existence tio higher level of existence through rightfull thinking and action-( rightfull thinking means that way of thinking that do not create another covering around ur soul which is in the process of purification due to ur right thinking and activity_)which brings expansion of ur thinking and existence so that u may recognise other individual souls just as we see the embodied individuals now
all this happens when u create a state of mind that becomes sensitive enough to discriminate which is good and which is not good for ur return journey towards our original state which was pure and simple unlike this present existence.
Posted by: Mr. jogarao pilla At: 17, Sep 2003 10:25:30 AM IST
yes, aatmaas can identify aatmaas.
and aatmaas are identified by their names only, they look like their bodies... haven't you seen in movies? same.
Posted by: Durga Prasad At: 15, Sep 2003 9:12:01 PM IST
Can Aatma identify another aatma by it's living body or by it's aatma? what's the identity of Aatma after leaving a body?
Posted by: Mr. M Kumar N At: 15, Sep 2003 8:19:42 PM IST
13 yrs of exp, with Atma or in heaven/hell? just confusing, Vijay!!!
Posted by: Durga Prasad At: 15, Sep 2003 7:02:04 PM IST
There is no ambiguity in my stmts. I said that everything including God decended from the original source called the ultimate, and it is only difference in the state of existence. God is simple , subtle and insignificant that can not be visible to the naked eye and man too decended from the same source but later due to the accumulated grossness, complexities, and heavyness lost his originality and lost his original home,which is the ultimate
The soul which is the cause of the human existence but which is enclosed in the body,always tries to get back to the purity which is the original condition, and this divergent action of soul and sensescreates the confusion to the mind and the conflicting views are the result.
So to understand the subject in right perspective one needs to have an open mind without any preconcieved notions. once you examin my previous postings with an open mind you will appreciate my effort to make you to understand what i mean by all this. if still you carry doubts about the subject you are welcome to send your doubts tomy inbox so that i will give you more clarifications to help you understand this vague subject as i understood from my master.
Posted by: Mr. jogarao pilla At: 15, Sep 2003 5:46:16 PM IST
Aatma Yatra?
Posted by: Mr. M Kumar N At: 15, Sep 2003 5:22:30 PM IST
I asked all these again b'coz there were conflicts in ur thought and JP's thought..he said nature created God and u say God created nature..u say heaven is there and he says they r imaginary..as he is having 13 yrs of experience ..I thought this time I will get reasonable answers..but there r lot of conflicts in believers also..fisrt sort out urself who created what ..and what is the actual truth..
Good bye..
Posted by: విజయ్ At: 15, Sep 2003 3:32:19 PM IST
//
The religion or God that we r following today were suggested by our earlier generations as per their understanding and level!
//
Yes I agree with that.But they created all these out of superstitions..earlier the litracy level was low..they created god from everything which is good ..like Sun,Moon,rivers(ganga) and even earth..This kind of creation is still there in villages and some tribal areas..b'coz the litracy level is still below average there..same thing might have happened thousands of yrs ago..
I still dont understand that why all these r prevalent in Hinduism only..other religions dont believe everything as god(americans already conquered Moon..so its no more a god ..I believe)..
Hence I conclude that 3 crore gods r human creation ..Believe in one power thats ok..kaani India lo prathi chettu putta ni devudu ga convert chesi pujichchadam entha varuku nyayam?
Posted by: విజయ్ At: 14, Sep 2003 8:18:36 PM IST
Situation is toatally under confusion. No doubt.
Chaos between whom? religion
Which one first:
Join a religion on belief and prove yourself
or ask a religion to prove something and then join a religion?
Posted by: Mr. M Kumar N At: 14, Sep 2003 5:06:24 PM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
