|
|
|
General Forum: Current 'Affairs' | | Marriage: Is it a male sexist tool? | |
| thats what I meant, the bond u were talking about to keep the couple together, y can't it be Marraige... Did I say marraige is obligation?? I said responsibility. Why do you say who ever want they can leave any time. why do u wnat to get into that kind of situation??
About the inc of population is because, for example there is one couple they got 2 kids with out being married, and they want to seperate and after some time they meet 2 different people and like them to stay together now they can each think of trying for 2 more each kids. Its because the oppisite person may be interested to have his/her own kids. so what u think in this case, when u love some body you got understand and support their wish too right... don't u think this is not going to inc the population may not be rapidly, but contributes to it.
Posted by: chantabbayi At: 24, Nov 2003 10:36:26 PM IST
so chanti you mean to say marriage is an obligation?if two people love each other they must be able to stay with one another no mattere what .....they dont need marriage for it ....and as for kids .....well they do have to have to conscience and love for kids and they will too.....no parent would want their kid to seem them get separated....if love cant keep two souls togethr i dont think marriage can do so too..and if marriage is done away with there will be no problem of dowry at all.....and the woman is always free to walk away if she doesnt like anything ...and that would infact make ppl more sensitive to each others feelings
and once kids are there i guess they are enough to keep couples bonded....
and as for population problem ....no woman would want to have more than two kids...so how would it inc population??it is the same situation now too.....maybe one guy would father more kids but the no of kids would be the same because the no of women is the same and the no of kids they want to have is the same (say 2)
think
Posted by: Mr. ravi keerti At: 24, Nov 2003 10:15:04 PM IST
yes..u r right swapna...so what??
Posted by: Mr. raja babu At: 24, Nov 2003 9:59:14 PM IST
Ravi: if u ban marraiges, Love become Sex tool for both male and female. If they are not bonded with responsibilities, there is a possibility of seperation and they may not be effected by each others but their kids do. They got 2 c new mom or dad each time they seperate. This is also going to help India in reaching 2 billion population pretty soon.(Guessing every couple wants to have children)
Swapna: Marriage is male sexist tool? oh yeah!! Women are buying men by giving dowry to have a nice sexist tool to entertain themselves. is that not true???
And regarding slavery: If a wife helps her husband in every aspect(cooking,washing,cleaning or what ever u say) is it ur definition for slavery?? hopefully u might have seen this kind of people in ur family? are they slaves??
Posted by: chantabbayi At: 24, Nov 2003 9:44:21 PM IST
i seriously think the concept of marriage must be rethought....infact if it were to me i would ban marriage.....it has lost its sanctity and there is no point in having it...so if two people love each other and decide to spend their lives together they should go ahead and live together instead of dubbing that relationship as marriage...i know society doesnt approve of it...but that is what is going to make couples happier..there is no concept of marriage laws on that occasion....a woman will stay with a man only if she trusts him and if she doesnt like him she is always welcome to walk out on him and she has all the rights that he has as an individual....
infact marriage was proposed as a method of securing the couples life..more precisely the womans life...women were the underdogs and they needed marriage for social and security reasons....not anymore...now women aer free and are growing stronger..they dont need any securities from a man.....all they need is the security of love....and so long as that is there ....marriage isnt necessary..
and no marriage means no concept of divorce and the long painful process of obtaining it and all those monetary settlements...
i strongly believe today's women can well take care of themselves
and one thing as for women sexuality...i dont understand why that has to be made a big deal??i dont really think being open about sexuality proves freedom and developement of women...there are scores of areas where women have done well and where they can assert their superiority and excellence...definitely there are better guages of strength than an open mind for discussing sexuality openly..
Posted by: Mr. ravi keerti At: 24, Nov 2003 9:09:51 PM IST
---everyone knows that men fall in love looking at the physical beauty of a female---
So how women fall in love?? they don't look at beauty? what they look at??
Is man always the inititator for the love??
Posted by: chantabbayi At: 24, Nov 2003 8:01:12 PM IST
"Marriage" well is it not controlling the needs of an individual which can effect the society by all means ?
Rapes, prostitution, sex workers, kidnapping, etc they are crimes / unwanted things or rather blessings?
Posted by: Mr. M Kumar N At: 24, Nov 2003 4:52:30 PM IST
one need not universalise his/her stmts if in doubt but at the same time can generalise stmts when applicable to every one.
Posted by: Mr. jogarao pilla At: 24, Nov 2003 4:14:23 PM IST
Baga chepparu rani garu e sari allage chepputhanu andi
Posted by: sasidhar sasi At: 24, Nov 2003 3:01:03 PM IST
Baga chepparu rani garu e sari allage chepputhanu andi
Posted by: sasidhar sasi At: 24, Nov 2003 2:57:25 PM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
