|
|
|
General Forum: Current 'Affairs' | | Telangana :: Is Telangana issue going to be the 'decisive factor' in the ensuing state? | |
| quote:They don't pay for extra 25% water mixed in milk.
Mallika garu, don't be so biased. Moreover, i did not give you a cooked figure. Its a fact.
Posted by: Mr. Spider Man At: 19, Feb 2004 7:33:17 PM IST
Just FYI, the AP govt pays rs.9.58/liter of milk in telangana region and the same govt pays rs.12.36/liter in coastal area. Can anybody explain why this happens?
Posted by: Mr. Spider Man At: 19, Feb 2004 10:32:19 AM IST
quote:.There is no grudge among Coastal and Rayalaseema people against Telangana people
oh then, how did you say there is grudge among telangana people against other people.
quote:For CBN, it is not necessary to contest from another state. There is no point here.I too don't see your point there.
That was my point. For KCR too, it is not necessary to contest from other regions.
quote: it has to invite troubles from Maharashtra and Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh, on water sharing with little scope for constructing irrigation dams
Don't we already have problems with the same set of regions now?
quote:If it is so, who can innocent people develop!
Do you mean to say innocent people can't develop? Remember? you were once an innocent kid?
quote: Mr.Chandra Sekhar Rao need to communicate with the total Andhra Pradesh
Why should KCR communicate with TOTAL AP? He is concerned about telangana only.
Posted by: Mr. Spider Man At: 18, Feb 2004 7:39:11 PM IST
Quote:"I personally felt it, even though I went to rural villages of Telangana villages on part of my field work. They respected me, but with bias"
Vachaspati garu,
Day in and day out, how much respect do the telangana people get (without bias) from other people? Everybody knows that. One small incidence happens to you, and thats an issue, but telangana people get a raw deal for decades and thats ok?
Quote:"TRS unnecessarily developed grudge among the rural areas against people of Andhra region and Rayalaseema"
And, who developed grudge among other people against telangana people?
Quote:"How much efficient engineers, doctors, professions can be produced from that region...because of lack of facilities during the three hundred years of Nizam rule"
Oh, so telangana region is underdeveloped because of nizams rule? But, i thought the UNITED Andhra govt ruled the region for last 50 years.
Posted by: Mr. Spider Man At: 17, Feb 2004 11:57:07 PM IST
Vachaspati garu,
I did not understand your point : "If he has guts, he should contest in Total Andhra Pradesh"..
For instance, TDP doesn't contest in any state other than AP. Does that mean CBN doesn't have guts or does it mean he doesn't know how to develop a region? If he doesn't know how to develop a region, why contest in AP too? If he knows, why can't he contest in entire india?
I don't see your point there.
And hey, looks like KCR is convinced that a separate state for Telangana can improve the chances of development in that region. So, he is contesting from that region. Now, why should he be contesting from other regions, when he is bothered only about telangana and not other regions?
I thought atleast some of you knew that the andhra region was part of madras state before the people here asked for a separate state for the same reasons that telangana is asking for a separate statehood today.
If telangana and KCR are convinced that they have a better chance of development being a separate state, why should any one have a problem? Give them a chance. Maybe, they will falter initially, but they will learn and improve. Didn't Andhra Pradesh develop after getting separated from the madras state? Why can't telangana do the same?
Posted by: Mr. Spider Man At: 17, Feb 2004 11:35:18 PM IST
Separation is one of the solutions that are suggested by the leaders need not to be accepted by the public. Inturn the public should make hard enough these leaders to get developed.
Why the leaders don't take the blame because of undrdevelopmentdue to these fraud leaders. And imagine what will happen if the total power is transfered to these leaders.
Posted by: Mr. M Kumar N At: 16, Feb 2004 8:29:13 PM IST
See,this issue raised by of some politicians, ok,if telangana divided from Andhra,if they r neglacting develop some area in that telangana,again they want raise same kind of issue for another telangana, see if these people wants to solve that,they can,but they never do that, just think about present politicians who r working for telangana, they r really like to do for telangana...?, people knows what the did for telangana, what kind of mistakes they did in past, thing is people should understand, it will take time,once people understand this issue, then no TRS... only Jai Andhra
Posted by: Mr. Amarendra Chakravarthi Vegi At: 16, Feb 2004 5:59:56 PM IST
you people forget the concept of synergy.
i posted a question asking for explanation , at the 'seperate telangana' discussion.
i am busy these days. will be back with my reasoning soon. mean while think on synergy.
Posted by: Mr. MAHESWARA MAHI At: 14, Feb 2004 2:56:53 AM IST
We welcome decisive factors definetly; but it's a division factor. Only political people can help us.
Posted by: Mr. M Kumar N At: 13, Feb 2004 8:57:36 PM IST
No, Mr Chandra sekhar may only be able to get a few MLA seats and a few MP seats. Thus 8 MP seats and 25 MLA seats may go for TRS. And as there will be vote for anti-incumbency..Chandrababu's tally may be further reduced by (when compared to present seats and after considering TRS factor) 5 MP seats and 30 MLA seats. Over all Chandrababu may get around 140-150 to MLA seats (BJP at around 20 MLA seats,..Total around 160-170),... and 15 MP (+5 by BJP) seats. Overall he will be able to retain the power comfortably. Recently he (along with Vajpayee)got the blessings of PUTTAPARTI SAIBABA also naaaa
Posted by: Mr. sridhar great At: 13, Feb 2004 2:37:00 PM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
