|
|
|
General Forum: Society | | heiMdava vivAhavyavastha | |
| inTipErE kaadu vErE kaTTubaaTlu anTE jaataaSauchamu, mRutaaSauchamu ivi kooDaa maarataayi. puurvam ekkuvamandi pillalni kanEvaaru appudu strIlu baagaa musaligaa kanipistaaru. kaabaTTE vayassulO takkuva vunDaalani. maamuulugaa strIlalO muTluDugu kaalam 46 - 50 varaku vunTundi. aTupimmaTa vaaLLaku daampatyakOrikalu taggipOtaayi. adE purushuDaitE 55 - 60 varaku kooDaa churukugaa vunTaaru. mukhyamgaa dInini baTTE vayassulO tEDaa manapuurvikulu peTTi vunDavachchu.
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 1, Mar 2005 5:18:34 PM IST
I think Sastri garu was talking about it from a "SOCIAL" perspective, not the "LEGAL" one!
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 1, Mar 2005 5:15:56 PM IST
My opinion ( Please correct me if you find me wrong)
2. Change of surname:
During those days, the surname of a person used to be the name of that person's village/town.
When a woman was born she used to be with her parents at the village of her parents .. hence she used to have her parents surname as her surname initially ..
But when she got married and had been shifted to her husband's village . Since she was no more an inhibitant of the old village, she used to derive the surname of her "in-laws" ...
_____________________________________________
1. About age difference (I am not sure)
Traditionally, it has been a practice to respect the elders .. so the male, being the head of the family in a typical patriarchial society, needed to be older than the female so that his orders could be obeyed (Since many of the people used to get married when they were young and kids seldom disobey someone whoz elder to them)
One more reason could be .. since the Male was responsible for safeguarding the interests of the family, they might have thought it would be easier for the older person to take the responsibilties than the younger
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 1, Mar 2005 4:43:36 PM IST
nAku vachchina oka imeyil mIku teliyabarustunnAnu.
Name: xx xx xx
Date: 28, Feb 2005
Subject: Hello Sir
Sastry garu..
i need a small help from u. actually i am having 2 doubts on marriage (these doubts came in our frds discussion)
1.mana hindu marriage lo abbayi ammayi kante enduku age lo peddaga vundalani nirnayincharu?
puranalalo sita ramudi kanna ..radha krishnudi kanna peddadi antaru kada?
2.ammayi inti peru (surname)pelli ayyaka enduku change avuthundi abbayi inti peru ki?
veetiki emanna puranallo kani general ga kaani vunnayaa vunte cheppagalaru.
namassulatho
xx xx xx
.
mitrulu mI abhiprAyAlni teliyajEya prArdhana
Posted by: Mr. VIRABHADRA SASTRI KALANADHABHATTA At: 1, Mar 2005 4:27:22 PM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
