|
|
|
General Forum: Current 'Affairs' | | ~~~~ TERRORISTS ATTACK RAM TEMPLE ~~~~~ | |
| Yeah Prasanthi, thats why I objected only the part of first sentence, not the entire posting.
Posted by: Bahud♥♥rapu Baatasaari At: 12, Jul 2005 1:44:30 PM IST
Yes. Rightly said BB. But what I suppose is Doboy's intention might be hindu majority rather than dominance.
Posted by: Ms. Prasanthi Uppalapati At: 12, Jul 2005 12:33:45 PM IST
Doboy, I too agree with you. May be the Hindu in me supports your view. But as long as our bloody leaders involve in monkey politics and depend on votebanks and trumpcards, there can never be a solution to this issue. As long as Pakistan tries to lure or intoxicate few outraged individuals here, the conflict continues.
It is shame on us that inspite of the togetherness and f'ship of all these years, we couldn't fully trust others at tense times.
Posted by: Ms. Prasanthi Uppalapati At: 12, Jul 2005 12:32:00 PM IST
I strongly object with the first part of your first sentence DoBoy ji! And to some extent, the second part of your first statement.
Posted by: Bahud♥♥rapu Baatasaari At: 12, Jul 2005 12:27:24 PM IST
BB, I too agree that Hindus are tolerant than people of other religions. My comment was just a comment on the incidents that happened. There was no personal reference either to u or anyone else.
Coming to supporting the people who bashes Hindu religion. May I know what you exactly meant by 'supporting' here?
This is a common platform mainly intended for telugu people. In telugu people, there are muslims, christians and other religions and based on their opinions (to what they are subjected to) they use the language here. So there is no question of moderation here.
As members we are all opposing or debating such persons. Thats it.
Coming to the ideology, I always feel that citizens must have an idea on what was going in their respective countries and all over the world too and must frame an opinion and to decide where they stand etc., But when it comes to critical issues, I couldn't decide. We cannot justify what is right, what is wrong, what is good, what is bad etc.,
Hope many of us watched the movie 'Khadgam'. I didn't understand why few muslims opposed it. I am a fan of Vartha daily and ofcourse of Mehajabeen too. But somehow I couldn't approve of or expect her letter in the 'Letters to Editors' section. They are no different. Then I penned an article as a response to her letter. I didn't send it to Vartha but submitted here but mine was rejected saying I need maturity to understand the things.
Actually I posted it to another group (which includes the citizens of all countries) and send it to few of my NET friends. Mr. Sri from TeluguCinema.com liked it and asked my permission whether to post it or not in that site. I said ok and u do not believe there was much discussion on it in that site. After sometime, I became a silent spectator and my heart, as a pendulum, move from that side to this side, listening to those arguments. So such topics can never end.
After much thinking (though I am not an intellectual) I came to a conclusion similar to the concept of chinna geeta, pedda geeta . If you want to make a big one small, you need to draw a big line beside it. Similarly if you want to wipe out bad, strengthen the good. That is the only way for real progress.
Posted by: Ms. Prasanthi Uppalapati At: 12, Jul 2005 12:24:59 PM IST
India is hindu dominated country, probably the only two nations which have major hindu domination is india and nepal. Our country is really very flexible, i mean the hindu majority. There is lot of importance attached to Ayodhya in epics. Why on earth should there be an issue, can't other religions not accommodate to give hindus so much of freedom to have their temple, can't they do that small sacrifice. Which other country can boast with hindu majority to have sikh pm, muslim president, and may be a christain head could have also become pm.
Are we not flexible.? If we cannot build a temple in our country , can be afford to do in any other country. It is sheer politics that is dividing country , people, & religions.
Posted by: DoBoy At: 12, Jul 2005 12:14:22 PM IST
nIkO vishayam telusA praSAntI! hinduvulakunnanta paramata sahanam inkevvarikI lEdu I bhUprapancham lO. nEnu ennaDU itara matAlni kinchaparachalEdu. nA bAdha evaDO hindU matAnni EmainA annADanO kAdu, asalalAnTi vATini manam ikkaDa (eTlIsT TIpI lO) enduku enkarEj chEstunnAmu? alAnTi vALLani manam enduku bahishkarincharAdu? DairakTugA dUshistE parlEdu, mata pichcha anukOvachchu. pakka dArlu paTTinchi lEnivi kalpinchi enduku cheppAli? ilAnTi vATini manam aDDukOvaDam tappA?
nEnennaDU rAmAlayam kAvAlanO masIdu kUlchAlanO analEdu. adantA rAjakIyam . manakavi vaddu. kalmasha hRudayulni manam dUrangA peTTaDAnni gUrchi AlOchinchAli.
nIku marOsAri cheptunnA. nEneppaTikI ippaTikI "nO fasT yUj " ki kaTTubaDi unnA. nEnu mundugA evarinI tiTTanu. evarainA sarE. porapATuna oka sAri vEvAni tiTTA, nannu tiTTindi vErE manishainA vEvA ani porabaDi. adi grahinchi venTanE bahirangangA kshamApaNalu cheppukunnA. nannu anavasarangA kadilistE nEnenduku UrukOvAli? cheppu?
Posted by: Bahud♥♥rapu Baatasaari At: 12, Jul 2005 12:04:59 PM IST
SDBji, I didn't differentiate educated and normal people. I expressed about the conflict within a person, at one end the educationist asks, 'is it necessary?', the common man in us (based by birth, influences of surroundings etc., etc.,) asks 'why not?'.
I too agree that intensity and the expression vary. But what about the feeling and reaction? Many educated elite in Hindus do not give much importance or insist on the construction of Ram temple. If it is so, we would have it already. There would not be any question or conflict at all if all of us supported it.
Posted by: Ms. Prasanthi Uppalapati At: 12, Jul 2005 11:58:06 AM IST
Hello BB, Whatever may be the reason, if we go on digging this way, there never will be an end. I am also a Hindu. Sentiments arouse. There is always a conflict between the educated and the normal person with sentiments in us. I do not have fixed idea with respect to 'whether I want a Ram temple or not'.
I did write an article 'Sentiments' but I am not giving the link ofcourse:) It is there in my list of articles in authorsden. cheppakanE cheputunnaa :))
Posted by: Ms. Prasanthi Uppalapati At: 12, Jul 2005 11:40:58 AM IST
OhO appiDiyA!
nijamE praSAntI, inkO pAvuganTa sEpu tIriggA AlOchistE nuvvannadi arthamaindi. sariggAnE cheppAvu. kAnI nEnannadAnTlO mAtram tappu lEdu, Akharu vAkyam lO tappa. adi O vyaktinuddESinchi nErugA chEsina vyAkhyalA undi. kAnI okka sAri charitrani tiragEstE nIkE arthamautundi, nEnannadAnTlO enta nijamundO ani. endukanTAvA, oka pressODu sabarmati vishayam marchipOyi A tarvAta gOdhrAlO jariginadAnni khanDistU mammalni(anTE hinduvulni) dUshinchaDam modaleTTADu. alA enduku chEstAvu bAbU, nIku sabarmati gurtukurAlEdA anTE, adi vALLaki jariginadAniki riyAkshanu ani annADu. adEnTI anTE, taratarAlugA vALLani mIru(anTE hinduvulaina mEmu) himsinchAru, A kaksha okkasArigA pellubiki alA jarigindi, sO dAniki bAdhyulu mIrE(anTE hinduvulaina mEmu) ani annADu. mari ataniki idi kUDA nE cheppinaTTu kanapaDDam lO vinta lEdugA, eppuDO okappuDu ilAnE chebutADu, andukE nEnE mundugA cheppESA. mari indulO Viciousness nIku kanipistE tappulEdukAnI kAsta charitra telusunTE mAtram nuvvalA ani unDavu ani nA pragADha viSvAsam .
Posted by: Bahud♥♥rapu Baatasaari At: 12, Jul 2005 8:22:37 AM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
