
|
|

General Forum: Current 'Affairs' | mana muKyamantri teerupai spandinchanDi | |
| Mr.Vachaspathi,
Are you also a law graduate or are you doing LL.B.?
You are right.Courts will not punish people without proper reasons.The Police will prosecute the accused persons through the Public Prosecutors and the defence lawyer will defend the accused.The Courts will appreciate the evidence (a legal phrase) produced on behalf of both the Prosecution and the Defence and then only will take a decision.
To become a judge, one has to first pass LL.B. and get himself enrolled with the Bar Council of India or a State.Then he has to practise as an Advocate in a Court of Law for several years to become eligible to appear for a written examination (Only when a notification is issued by the High Court) and be qualified in the said written test.Then he will be called for an interview.In the written examination his legal knowledge and professional knowledge is tested.In the interview his personality and suitability is assessed.Hence it is not so easy to be a Judge.
Therefore please donot comment on the Courts and Judges, as it amounts to contempt of Courts.Who ever speaks sarcastically about Courts and Judges will be punished with imprisonment (jail).
Posted by: Mr. B.A. Tilak , Advocate. At: 12, Jan 2006 5:51:46 PM IST
jaDj lu ishTam vachchinaTTu Sikshalu vEyyaru mAmU...!
tamariki anta sInulEdu.
grahinchanDi.
jaDj ayyunTE anE kalalu kanakanDi.
jaDj anTE EmTO kUDA tamariki
teliyadanna vishayam tamarE cheppEsukunTunnAru.
"mA tAta E TATAnO birlAnO ayyunTE"..annaTTugA undi...tamari "nEnu jaDjni ayyunTE.." anEdi!!
tamaru jaDj ayyE avakASam
asalE lEdu.
tamarEm aSinchi ikkaDa nunchi tarimEsinA pEru mArchukuni vastunnAru. E pablisiTI kOsam !!??
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 12, Jan 2006 3:20:51 PM IST //In February, 2005, I sent a letter to the Honourable Supreme Court of India attaching some news items and my articles, and requested to take it as PIL. But no where my name was mentioned in almost all the english dailies. I thought it's due to lack of attaching lawyers endorcement. Now I would like to remaind the Apex Court regarding the same issue.//
:)))
:)))))))
:)))))))))))
//But no where my name was mentioned in almost all the english dailies. //
Are you interested in that or in the PIL? Be happy you were not awarded jail term. Had I been the judge, I would have awarded you at least 1yr community service, in NE-Railways.
Your greed for cheap publicity, is amazing man!!
//I thought it's due to lack of attaching lawyers endorcement. //
YES! You would have to pay lawyer-fee for that. Unfortunately, nothing.. nothing is free in business-lunch!
//Now I would like to remaind the Apex Court regarding the same issue//
This time I am going to take-up your case, be prepared, select a line in NER! :))))
=========
//suggest that the use of widely available ultrasound and other diagnostic tools in India, followed by abortion of female foetuses, explained the discrepancy. //
Right cause,..
Posted by: Keerty At: 12, Jan 2006 9:04:11 AM IST
...
tamariki anta sInulEdu.
grahinchanDi.
jaDj ayyunTE anE kalalu kanakanDi.
jaDj anTE EmTO kUDA tamariki
teliyadanna vishayam tamarE cheppEsukunTunnAru.
tamaru jaDg ayyE avakASam
asalE lEdu.
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 12, Jan 2006 3:10:27 PM IST telugu varu hanumanthudu laga tama sakthi samardhyalu teliyani vaaru ani nirupinchadu. alaage pradhaniki tagga chief minister anipinchaadu.
mana pradhani majee inance minister mariyu majee RBI Governor !ento goppa anubhavam record manchivaadu ani peru pratishtalundi desamlo dabbundi desamlo unna technocrats vedesalaki potunte, videsala bankulu ikkadiki vachi vyaparam chestu unte aayanki maatram ikkada unna dabbuni ikkada unna technology/ists ki mudi pettadam elaago teliya ledu.
alaage mana mukhya mantriki kuda.
andukane veeriddaru kalisi prvasi bhratiya divas anee chandrababu lagaa ido kotta prachra vyuham. inta matraana veeru desa bhaktula lagaa chelamani kavalanukovatam pedda porapatu. (Bofors vishayam lo veeru kaneesam chrge sheet dakhalu cheyaka[poga cheyaledani kaneesa matram evarinee adagaka povatam).
ee nepadhyam lo pravasi bharateeya divas enduku.( panicheyani mikulato)
ikkada undi vyaparam chesi taxes kadataamane varike VAT regn. certificate ivvatanike computerlu pani cheyavu. service tax regn ki velite hu hu hu ..........
idee paristhitee
evado videsalalo undevaadu edo industry pedatamante andu valla palakulaki edaina prayojanam untundante permission girmission. leka pote hi hi hi common sense leni fool. ani navvukuntaaru.
ante idee palana.
evaraina inte anukondi. kakapote pravas bharateeya divas nirvahinchaadu kanuka meeru adigaru kanuka.........
desadyakshudu oka scientist.
prime minister oka headucated. chief minister oka doctor.
ae govt. officela lonu computerlu pani cheyavu. Govt. hospitals lo ......equipment paristhiti........ police stationala lo latest communication equi[pment usage........ nil
inka science common daggariki teesukellalane ninadam EE RASHTRA PRAJALANI FOOL CHEYATAME.ILAA CHANDRABABU FOOL NI CHESI EMAYYADO........
Posted by: Mr. rambabu ramachandrula At: 12, Jan 2006 12:46:42 PM IST o.k. Tilakji..
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 11, Jan 2006 7:13:41 PM IST ...In February, 2005, I sent a letter to the Honourable Supreme Court of India attaching some news items and my articles, and requested to take it as PIL. But no where my name was mentioned in almost all the english dailies. I thought it's due to lack of attaching lawyers endorcement. Now I would like to remaind the Apex Court regarding the same issue. What do u say?
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 11, Jan 2006 5:09:01 PM IST
=====
Mr.Vachaspathi,
If you want to file a PIL there must be certain requirements.This needs lot of information.However I am giving hereunder some examples so that you may yourself fit into any one of them.
1.There must be a petition which affects a large number of people but couldnot be filed by any one due to poverty or no chances of being united by the affected parties etc.Then you can file a PIL.Example:Pollution.
2.If the Petitioner is very poor and if his fundamental rights are violated - then his letter may be treated as a Writ Petition.
In your case the above two are not there and more over there is already a direction by the apex court in this regard.The only thing that can be done is to get the said direction implemented.It is not because your name is not there in the news articles.I am sorry to say this.
Posted by: Mr. B.A. Tilak , Advocate. At: 11, Jan 2006 6:42:04 PM IST Times of India, 9th January, 2006.
....
WASHINGTON: An estimated 10 million female foetuses have been aborted in India over the last two decades, according to a study of birth rates by British medical journal ‘Lancet’.
A team of researchers from Canada and India analysed information from 133,738 births in 1997 across India, and determined that fewer females are born as second or third children to families who do not yet have a boy, compared to those who already have a boy.
The statistics according to birth order were striking, according to the study that is being published online on Monday.
The sex ratio for the second birth when the preceding child was a girl was 759 girls per 1,000 males, and for the third child was 719 girls if the previous two children were girls. But if the previous children were boys, there were from 1,102 to 1,176 girls born for every 1,000 males.
The girl rates dropped even more precipitously for children born to more educated mothers - with schooling beyond Class 10 - where only 683 to 756 girls were born for every 1,000 boys if the previous births were girls.
The data on female fertility, taken from an ongoing Indian national survey of six million people, showed that only 13.1 million girls were born that year. According to natural sex ratios from other countries, there should have been 13.6 to 13.8 million girls born in 1997, indicating a shortfall of 590,000 to 740,000 female babies.
The authors of the study - Indian-origin Prabhat Jha of St. Michael's Hospital at the University of Toronto, and Rajesh Kumar of the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research in Chandigarh, India, - suggest that the use of widely available ultrasound and other diagnostic tools in India, followed by abortion of female foetuses, explained the discrepancy.
"We conservatively estimate that prenatal sex determination and selective abortion accounts for 0.5 million missing girls yearly," he said. "If this practise has been common for most of the past two decades since access to ultrasound became widespread, then a figure of 10 million missing female births would not be unreasonable."
Prenatal sex determination has been illegal since 1994, but the law is often ignored, the study said.
Other statistics supported the finding, the study said. Among children six years old or younger in India, the number of girls per 1,000 boys has dropped from 962 in 1981 to 945 in 1991 and 927 in 2001.
The practise of aborting female foetuses appears to be even more widespread in China, where only 847 to 877 girls were born for every 1,000 boys in 2002.
The authors ruled out infanticide as an explanation for the lower numbers, pointing out the wide availability of ultrasound and other diagnostic procedures.
"To have a daughter is socially and emotionally accepted if there is a son, but a daughter's arrival is often unwelcome if the couple already have a daughter," Shirish Sheth of the Breach Candy Hospital in Mumbai wrote in a Lancet editorial.
Daughters "eventually belong to the family of her future husband", Sheth wrote.
THIS IS BECAUSE OF DOWRY PRACTICE.
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 11, Jan 2006 6:34:57 PM IST I believe that Hindu Succession (Amendment) ACt,2005 is directly linked with Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 as it is teethless in the present form. The family that gives dowry may not give equal property inheritence to the daughter. Is that right?
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 11, Jan 2006 6:20:47 PM IST I believe that Hindu Succession (Amendment) ACt,2005 is directly linked with Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 as it is teethless in the present form. The family that gives dowry may not give equal property inheritence to the daughter. Is that right?
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 11, Jan 2006 6:19:16 PM IST I believe that Hindu Succession (Amendment) ACt,2005 is directly linked with Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 as it is teethless in the present form. The family that gives dowry may not give equal property inheritence to the daughter. Is that right?
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 11, Jan 2006 6:11:25 PM IST
|
|
|
 |
Advertisements |
|
 |
 |
Advertisements |
|