|
|
|
General Forum: Religion | | Reality of family bonds ... | |
| Posted by: ★Vinåyåkåm★ chitt♥♥r At: 12, Jul 2007 10:12:37 PM IST
namastE vinaayakam gaaruu. spashTamgaa, muchchaTagaa mUDu mukkallO cheppaaru. charchakonasaagadIyaDam anavasaram
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 13, Jul 2007 9:52:23 AM IST
vinayakam garu,
well said (to the power of n times)
as hindus r shutting their mouths with patience, dogs like surya n assholes like lotus feet r barking lies by putting all-religion-equality guise. once we fuck these assholes out of this space, our culture regains its glory.
bastards like surya r wrongly interpreting the scriptures. they r making illiterates (in terms of sastra) as fools. selling their cheap schemes as best way to moksha. these kinda maniacs r much harmful than marketing-oriented-christian-assholes n brainless-jihadi-gangs
there is an urgent need to fuck these bastards. need to fuck them so hard that their eyes shud dazzle with pain n balls shud roll over rotten lotus feets
Posted by: Sagatu Telugu Jeevi At: 12, Jul 2007 10:21:28 PM IST
himduvulu verribAgulOLLu amdukE dEvuDu anni avatArAlu manadESam lO ettADu annappuDe telusu itanu anniTikI vakraBAshyam chebutunnADani . appuDE chUTTam mAnEsAnu..
kottadArAllO O lukkeyaDam tappa..
anamta kOTi BaktullO itaniki kAvalisimdi..
1)DabbUlu vichchalaviDigA dAnam chEsEvAru
2)moguLLani viDichi vILLachuTTU tirigE gOpikalu.
3)mAru mATlaaDakumDA sEva chEsE hanumamtulu.
4)idE avatAram amTE bOrlA paDi daNNam peTTEsatsamgulu.
migatA amtA duryodhanulu..
Teim& vEsT..
Posted by: ★Vinåyåkåm★ chitt♥♥r At: 12, Jul 2007 10:12:37 PM IST
dharmasya te bhagavatas tri-yuga tribhiḥ svaihi
sa chavatirsham tri-yugam
(from bhagavatam)
what does it say to the world, u dumb ass, that god comes in kaliyuga! does it say that i-am-the-lotus-feet-riding-wheel-chair??
as bhagavatam is not supporting ur scheme u wanna discard it. who the hell r u to discard the most revered scripture of hindu philosophy !!
if some 1 quotes from gita abt no incarnation in kaliyuga, u discard gita too
if some other 1 quotes from veda against u, u discard veda too
where the hell u r heading pinko !!
Posted by: Sagatu Telugu Jeevi At: 12, Jul 2007 10:10:46 PM IST
here is the proof abt this fella's confiscating capabilities
===
surya :"Gita is very much applicable to Kali yuga as it is preached at the end of dwapara yuga. As per Gita"
me: height of ur ignorance cud be seen here. Gita is applicable for all times. it is not only for bhuloka but even for all other upper n lower lokas. why the hell u talk scrap all the time??
Posted by: Sagatu Telugu Jeevi At: 7, Jul 2007 11:44:54 AM IST
===
pls note that this sucker's idea is that as gita was preached at the end of dwapara, it is applicable to kaliyuga. bcoz god told that "sambhavami pade pade", lotus feet born as physic lecturer
got his scheme, readers !!!!
when i said gita is for all times, to his convenience now, he is using my statement.
shame on u dirty creature.
Posted by: Sagatu Telugu Jeevi At: 12, Jul 2007 9:27:34 PM IST
"There is no meaning of the concepts like yuga sandhi etc. You show me scriptural proof in Veda or Gita or Shankara Bhashyam only"
why u harp "only"? did u not know that bhagavata is the essence of Veda? the Gita is in Veda? is sankara bhashya much abv bhagavata? has mr. murthy not given bhagavata sloka abt yuga sandhi? why the heck u talk scrap as whole time job :P
===
"Sruti smruti virodhetu"
fuck u bastard ! does this line mean "strike-off-sruti-against-smruthi".
for the best knowledge of real readers
Sruti smruti virodhetu means whichever is against BOTH SMRUTI & SRUTI.
this bastard doesn't know what is smruti, what is sruti, what is veda. but here he is, massacring the real essence of sacred lines of veda, purana n upanisht. let all the real well wishers of hinduism come here n make sure that this bastard shuts all his hole n runs away
===
"Gita (smruti) contradicts veda (sruti), the verse of Gita is not valid"
stop ur all pervading bullshit man! is gita a smruti? ur smruti is lost in the rotten smell of lotus feet. not even sankaracharya dared to say gita as smruti. u lack basic knowledge of sanskrit terminilogy. stop ur ass parading !!
if hindu scriptures r full of contradictions, why the hell u study them? shut ur ass, lick lotus feet, kick parents n be happy
===
"So, that verse could be some human intrusions in Gita"
"verse could be"...fuck ur interpretations. show me one such verse from Gita, u dumb ass. i will interpret n show u how it doesn't talk abt ur bloody incarnation
===
"In such case, how can you quote puranas against Veda or Gita? Either your interpretation is wrong or that verse was introduced by over intelligent human beings, who don't want human incarnation of God like many. The verse of purana can be discarded if it is against Veda and Gita"
fuck ur whole shit. u r a christian missionary in the disguise of a hindu. otherwise why the hell u uphold Jesus n try to fuck veda against purana n purana against gita n gita against ur asshole lotus feet. u r here to spread venomous disrespect towards hindu scriptures by repeatedly saying "purana-can-be-discarded", "Gita-can-be-discarded", "jesus-told-exactly-as-per-veda"
u sucker ! close ur all hole n run away from here
===
"Vedas & Gita are applicable for all times"
u shameless thief. why r u confiscating my statement. dear readers, go back n check my comments. i hv posted this statement as against this dumb ass's claim on gita's limits.
===
"Veda says that Lord comes in human form "
yea, for christian assholes, veda told jesus wud come. u r a christian-asshole-in-guise-of-hindu. thats why u utter jesus name time n again. run away fucker
===
Posted by: Sagatu Telugu Jeevi At: 12, Jul 2007 9:08:37 PM IST
e tO fevikAl kaa jOD hei..:))
Posted by: ★Vinåyåkåm★ chitt♥♥r At: 12, Jul 2007 8:48:29 PM IST
"But, you have to imagine the situation of Arjuna during that time when Lord was in front of him in human form"
"In such situation, considering Krishna as Lord by Arjuna is most difficult"
why the hell u r comparing Arjuna with thyself?? why the hell u r forcing ur ignorance on Arjuna. do u know who is he??
===
"Tell me, how many people accepted Krishna as Lord during His time?"
for dumb asses like u, here is the list:
1. Pandavas, kunti, panduraja, madri
2. bhishma, drona, krupa, aswathama, vidura, dhrutarashtra, gandhari
3. all yadavas, ur own gopikas
4. all rushis, sages, saints
5. all mortal humans like me n murthy
now the list of fellas who were not recognising
1. Duryodhana aka ur lotus feet
2. Dussanana aka u
3. Paundraka vasudeva aka wheel-chair-god
4. Rajaka of mathura nagara aka ur original form
by this time, u shud hv come to know that scores of ppl were worshipping krishna as lord except handful. this is being kaliyuga, handful of dummy gods can make scores of ppl fools :P
===
"This is the concept of contemporary human incarnation."
don't teach us the concepts. ur lotus feet kinda inscarnations require schemes not concepts
===
"when you read my posts with an intention to discuss the truth, then only you can understand the truth"
did u tell a single truth so far!!! except shitting a lot *L*
===
"Counter arguments are not wrong. They help me also to strengthen my concepts"
yea, strengthen ur concept of kick-thy-parents, kick-thy-wife, kick-thy-kids. one day, surely, they kick on u
===
"Infact, when one is in pursuit of learning only, he/she raises questions"
where hell i hv raised question. what the hell is there to learn from u? u, the dumb ass n the murder of true hindu philosophy, raising serious DOUBTS abt ur lotus-feet-kinda jokers.
===
"Jnana yoga is related to intelligence "
for a dumb ass like u jnana means intelligence. why the heck u write wrong translations all the time. did ur dumb ass lotus feet taught u that jnana is intelligence. hell with u all
===
"sadasat vivekah"
again, one more wrong interpretation. what the hell u understood from sadasat viveka? don't quote scriptures without ascertaining their true meaning
===
"but not to mind (mind is always emotional)"
here i catch u, the dumb ass. who the hell on this earth told mind is emotional?? hell with ur translations. it is not mind wich is emotional, it is the heart, u sucker !!!
===
"If you want to know the truth, don't get biased to anyone"
yup! like u, we shud lift up our ass & bend for the lotus feet. u suck man!!
===
"But, if i have to call the contemporary human incarnation as Lord, i have to do lot of analysis of the knowledge preached by Him"
whats that analysis? how many times u kicked ur parents!!!
===
"Goloka was created by Lord in Krishna avatara"
where it is written? show me
===
"Infact those sages in treta yuga (who latter on borned as Gopikas) asked Lord Rama to give them liberation"
this is just one part of the whole story abt gopikas. go n find the rest.
===
"Lord Krishna created Goloka for Gopikas for their climax of devotion"
just like the bedroom of ur so-called human incarnation, right *L*
===
"How can Goloka exist before its creation by Lord?"
wah! what a question indeed. class X student wud hv put more decent question than u, had he been told whole story!!!
Posted by: Sagatu Telugu Jeevi At: 12, Jul 2007 8:19:55 PM IST
Posted by: Mr. surya prakki At: 12, Jul 2007 8:49:03 AM IST
// An ordinary soul in the form of Yogi or a demon frequently exhibits his body to be beyond the rules of the nature because he is not insulted since he is not the creator of the rules of the nature. By such petty miracle the ignorant person believes such Yogi or demon as the Lord//
mITrayOlani nammE vaarantaa ajNjaanulanE mIru cheputunnaaraa!
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 12, Jul 2007 4:55:55 PM IST
Posted by: Mr. surya prakki At: 12, Jul 2007 8:49:03 AM IST
// An ignorant person insults Him seeing the ordinary human body, since he does not recognize the value of the internal form. This is told in Gita (Avajaananti Mam Mudhaah…). The Lord can make His body to be divine and above the rules of nature by His superpower. But He does not do this because He does not like to violate the rules of nature, since He is the creator of those rules. One will not generally contradict His own rule and insult himself. //
avajaananti maam muuDhaa@h ... annadi appaTilO vunna kamsa, jaraasandha, SiSupaala, duryOdhana modalaina raakshasulanuddESinchi ani intaku mundE cheppinaTlu gurtu. kalikaalam lO bhagavadavataaramulu lEnappuDu adi kalikaalaaniki vartinchadu. kaliyugam lO bhagavantuni avataaramulu lEvanna pramaaNaalanu intakumundE chepaanu.
tasmaachChaastram pramaaNam tE kaaryaa kaarau vyavasthitau ... gIta
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 12, Jul 2007 4:55:48 PM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
