|
|
|
General Forum: Current 'Affairs' | | spandinchanDi....spandana avasaramu.... | |
| Posted by: Bahud♥♥rapu Baatasaari At: 5, Dec 2005 9:32:58 AM IST
.
No. I didn't take Dowry!
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 12, Dec 2005 1:00:07 PM IST
Hello to all,
the participants are requested to hit the link and take the print of the Act for future debate...
http://www.telugupeople.com/discussion/article.asp?id=30178
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 12, Dec 2005 12:58:12 PM IST
mImIda kUDA kUsinta DouTostOndi kIrtI
Posted by: Bahud♥♥rapu Baatasaari At: 5, Dec 2005 5:21:58 PM IST
:))
Ayanaki spandichE naitika hakku lEdu akkA! endukO mIku telusu nAku telusu. manaki telusani vEvA ki telIdu :))
kaTnam tIsukunnOLLaki kaTnAniki vyatirEkangA mATlADEnduku nOrelA vastudO :O
Posted by: Bahud♥♥rapu Baatasaari At: 5, Dec 2005 10:32:58 AM IST
/*Giving and taking dowry is not an offence provided it is deposited in the name of the wife/bride within three months from the date of the marriage.However it is an offence if the husband or his relatives are demanding dowry from his wife or her relatives.
In criminal cases you can give a complaint to the police and the police may issue an FIR , but when the police file it in the Court, the Police will become the Complainant and the persons against whom you have lodged the complaint will become the Accused persons (muddailu) and you will be only a de-facto Complaint that means you are the informant.You will be only a witness, that is, PW1 or with some other number.
Therefore if any husband or his relatives are harrasing the wife/bride for want of dowry only the wife or her relatives can file a complaint and other third parties can only give information to the police about the incident and it is for the police to decide to file the complaint in the Court or not.If the wife is not interested in the criminal complaint, the police will not normally file the complaint in the Court but they will either send the couples for family counselling or they may warn the husband or his relatives.This course of action will be followed by the police to save the family and domestic life of the wife, but they will not simply act on the information given by third parties.
Posted by: Mr. B.A. Tilak , Advocate. At: 3, Dec 2005 1:28:31 PM IST*/
mundu dIniki samAdhAnam cheppu vEvA...
mAkandarikI telusu, nIdi miDimiDi NgNjAnamani, ippuDu nIku nuvvE nirUpinchukunnAvu. nIku telisindi paisA, rUpAya bilDappistAvu. assalu telInODikannA nIlA paisA telsinODitOnE nashTam samAjAniki.
/*Posted by: ۞\|/۞ అను ۞\|/۞ At: 4, Dec 2005 7:42:38 PM IST*/
sArI anupamagArU, pablik lO rechchipOvaDam nA tappani annAnu kAnI kaTnam tIsukOvaDam tappani analEdu. asalu nAkA uddESam kUDA lEdu. antenduku? vIlaitE grahakAlamAna paristhitulannI anukUlistE nEnu nA koDukki kaTnam tIsukunTAnani ghanTApathangA cheptunnAnu... I vEvAlu padivEvuraina okkanDunu okkanDunu okkanDunu nA Ika pIkajAlaru TIpIsabhAsadulArA, spandinchagan ...
endukanTE eduTivADiki cheppETanduke nItulu unnAyI ani vEvA kaTnam tIsukuni marI nirUpinchADu.
/*Posted by: ۞\|/۞ అను ۞\|/۞ At: 5, Dec 2005 5:38:54 AM IST*/
paruvu nashTam dAvA EstE EmistADU, EvALLAviDa kaTnangA techchina 40 vElu kUDA evarO kummESAru kadA!
paryavasAnagA EDU plas EDU plas okaTI mottam padihEnELLu lekkenTTukunTU unTADu
Posted by: Bahud♥♥rapu Baatasaari At: 5, Dec 2005 9:46:06 AM IST
/*Posted by: Mr. jogarao pilla At: 2, Dec 2005 4:35:35 PM IST*/
adE nEnu nettI nOrU koTTukuni mottukunnA. ainA I vEvA vin~lA
Posted by: Bahud♥♥rapu Baatasaari At: 5, Dec 2005 9:06:33 AM IST
Tilakji,
Government of Kerala amended the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. Now in Kerala, it's not even aggrieved party may give complaint againt Dowry, but even tertiary kin who are distant relatives can lodge a complaint. But Government of Andhra Pradesh yet to react in this regard.
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 4, Dec 2005 11:32:13 AM IST
Posted by: Mrs. Anupama K At: 3, Dec 2005 5:06:13 PM IST
Posted by: Amrapaali At: 3, Dec 2005 1:51:29 PM IST
...
HA...HHA....
nEnu Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 ni idE dAramlO renDu sArlu mottam paste chESAnu.
ippuDu evvarU chadavalEdu. appuDEmO Tilak gAru cheppagAnE, kaLLU terachAru.
anTE nanDi...
satI sahagamanam raddu chEyaDAniki British vALLU rAvAlsi vachchindi. achchu yantramu / padhati appaTikE China lO unnA manam British vALLU vachchEdAkA eduru chUSAm.
antenduku...mana charitra manaki British vALLU vachchina taruvAtE telisi vachchindi.
alAnTidE idi kUDA !
evarO vachchi mana kaLLU terapinchAlsindE tappa, manam mAtram kaLLu teravam !
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 4, Dec 2005 11:28:55 AM IST
There is discripancy in Dowru Prohibiton Act, 1961.
The heading of the Act itself Prohibits Dowry, but says within a specified time, the dowry taken must be returned to the bride!. Pathetic !
janamlO chaTTa akharAsyata unTE...
I dESam eppuDO bAgupaDEdi.
mana prabhutvAlu chEsina chaTTAlE manaki ardham kAvaDam lEdu.
avunA ? kadA ?
kOrTulu kachErila sabhalugA mArAyanTE,
janam chaTTalaki taddinAlu peTTi, janAniki pappaNNAlu peTTaDAniki alavATu paDaDamvallE !
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 4, Dec 2005 11:12:53 AM IST
Giving and taking dowry is not an offence provided it is deposited in the name of the wife/bride within three months from the date of the marriage
...
Thank Q Tilakji,
I knew this point.
But how many people follow it?
In that Act, there is a same provision banning publicity about giving or taking or offering Dowry! Please correct me, if I am wrong.
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 4, Dec 2005 11:07:20 AM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
