|
|
|
General Forum: Current 'Affairs' | | spandinchanDi....spandana avasaramu.... | |
| anTE enni sArlu kaTnAnni vyatirEkistE anni sArlu strItvam autundA?
Posted by: Bahud♥♥rapu Baatasaari At: 30, Nov 2005 5:46:40 PM IST
Vammo .. ee fire brand keerty evaru? Chaalaa ghaatu ga unnai messages! Kompadeesi aa Jayaprabha gaari chuttam kaadu kada
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 30, Nov 2005 5:04:03 PM IST
guD siTijen kannA mundu guD san gA guD hasbenD gA unDu vEvA. sin~siyar gA cheptunnA. mundu nI inTini diddu, tarvAta dESam .
ninnu kanaDamE vuman huD , ninnu bharinchaDamE vuman huD vEvA. oka ADadAniki sarTifikEshan anTEnE talli kAvaDam . akkaDE Ame yokka strItvam nirUpinchabaDutundi, kAnI nuv cheppE vATi valla kAdu. kaTnam vyatirEkinchaDamE strItvam anukunTE elA?
Dabbu, vastuvu mo|| bhArya pErunE unTE adi kaTnam kAdu, strIdhanam anTAvu. antEnA? maraitE mana dESam lO bOleDu mandi peLLi Taim lO attagAri daggarnunDi tamakochchina Dabbuni EdO rUpENA bhArya pErunE unchutunnAru, mari vALLu kaTnam tIsukOnaTlEgA, nI dRushTilO! antE kadU?! aitE, nuv guri peTTEdi kEvalam oka chinna sekTAr ni mAtramE. adI varakaTna chAvulu jarugutunna ati chinna sekTAr ni mAtramE vEvA. artham kAlEdu kadU!
Posted by: Bahud♥♥rapu Baatasaari At: 30, Nov 2005 3:32:53 PM IST
Posted by: Bahud♥♥rapu Baatasaari At: 29, Nov 2005 4:00:37 PM IST
...
Very nice to read this response.
I want to be a good citizen first.
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 30, Nov 2005 2:53:21 PM IST
/*Posted by: Mr Raghothama Rao At: 29, Nov 2005 3:52:33 PM IST*/
I am sorry guruji. I was off from him, but his filthy words towards Indian women pulled me here. It is very bad to use such filthy words to his mom, his sisters, his wife and his aunts. After all she is his own mom who gave birth to him and who raised him to this level in life, his own wife who left all her relatives and came with him to his house to live with him until he dies, his dad's sisters/mom's sisters-in-law who wished his good. Is this the opinion he is having towards Indian women? Is this the way to respect Indian women? Is this the attitude he show towards women whom he fight for? If so, why is he fighting? Does this show sincerity in his deeds? I sincerely and strongly object his words and demand his apologies to women folk.
Posted by: Bahud♥♥rapu Baatasaari At: 29, Nov 2005 4:39:33 PM IST
....
Never.
I shall not tender my apology to anybody who are law violaters. In fact, there are many women who failed to understand the relevance of certain laws that are meant for them. Womenhood is different from women. Many lost their original qualities of womenhood. They are just agents who do mechanical duties fixed in the social frame and structure. Enlightened women raise hue and cry about the education of women for the speedy redressel for their grievances and problems, but some women seldom listen !
CAN ANYBODY DENY, THAT THE DOWRY DEATHS ARE PRIMARILY DUE TO WOMEN? IT'S WOMEN WHO ARE IN FOREFRONT DEMANDING DOWRY IN MAJORITY CASES. IT'S A PREPLANNED MURDER OF A WOMAN BY WOMAN ALONG WITH MEN. SECTION. 498 A DELIBERATLY INCLUDED ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE FAMILY OF PROCREATION OF A WOMAN WHO FACES DOWRY HARASSMENT. SHAME ON THOSE WOMEN, WHO ARE MENTIONED IN THAT LAW, IN SHAMEFUL MANNER. YET, THEY DON'T FEEL EITHER SHAME OR THINK ABOUT THEIR ATTIUDE.
vyAsAlalO intakannA tIvramaina vyAkhyalE chEsAnu.
akkaDE tElu kuTTina dongallA unnAru. kshamApaNa avasaramE lEdu.
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 30, Nov 2005 2:42:17 PM IST
kaTnam strIdhanamgA marina takshaNam...
dAnipai bharta hakkulu kOlpOtADu.
gamaninchanDi!
unmAdilA tanni tagalEsi adi kAjEddAmanukunTE,
A strI jAgRutamaina manasu kaligi unTE, A strI dhanAnni rakshinchukOgaladu. akkaDa Section.498A unDanE undi.
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 30, Nov 2005 2:25:47 PM IST
Frankly speaking,
kaTnamE Prohibit chEsinappuDu ,
kaTnam tIsukunnAnani...
kaTnam istAnani ,
bahirangamgA prakaTinchaDam ,
kaTna dhara cheppukOvaDam ,
kaTnam istAnani prakaTinchaDam ,
edainA bahirangamgA cheppaDam ...
Everything is illegal, Because dowry itself is prohibited in India.
kaTnam vyaktigata vishayam anEdi vaTTi mATa.
kAdu !
kanE kAdu!!
kAvAlanTE tilak gArini sampradinchachchu...
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 30, Nov 2005 2:21:16 PM IST
INRP®ªPÍÎÏs ®ªPͪSgSLRPv , NS©«svNRPÌsv NRPWƒS ª«sLRPNRPÈPõ Z©ËÍQLRP xmsLjscnTsÌÜÍNTP ª«srSsòLiVV @¬s @LsÛÈQËÍ ª«Pãwú»RsLs... »Rsxmsoö.
That is ABSOLUTELY WRONG @NRPäƒRs FPc¯Í catch DLsÈsvLscTs.
THAT IS WHAT WE ARE SERIOUSLY MISSING . @ZcËÍQc¯Í xmspLjsògS »QPÌsvxqsvN¯ÍNRPVLsƒS FPLs»Rs}qsxmso Z©ËÍQLRPLs , |mnsWLRPLs @¬s ª«P§§LscRsvNRPV F¡»Rsv©Sõ®ªPͧ®ªsW ®ªPͪSgSLRPv. N¯Ls¿PLs úÛÊQËÍNºs ®ªPÍzqs @cTs gRPª«P§¬sLs¿RsLsƒTs.
Posted by: ۞\|/۞ అను ۞\|/۞ At: 29, Nov 2005 5:05:05 PM IST
....No. Correct. Technically it is quoted in the law. Registeration of Prestations is a must. But due to loopholes of that act, nobody follows it.
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 30, Nov 2005 2:12:56 PM IST
anupamagArU....
manchi bhAryAbhartala madhya Dabbu prasakti anavasaram.
vArini viDagoTTaDam kUDA asAdhyam.
okavELa viDipOtE adi vAri chuTTU unna 'pedda manushula' jOkyam vallE jarugutundi.
bandham minchi vAri madhya manchi snEham unTE chAlu.
samasyalani vAru bAgAnE edurkonTAru.
kaTnam lEkunDA adi strIdhanam ayitE dAni pai bhartaki sAmskRutikamgA hakkulunDavu.
adi vyavahArikamgA 'pasupukommula' pErutO istunTAru. burra unna tanDri A 'pasupukommula' pErutO sthirAsti kUturiki ivvaDam tama chuTTu gamaninchanDi.
alA kondaru chEstAru.
adi chaTTAlu kUDA gurthinchAyi.
alAnTappuDu aviDaki enta ichchinA adi AviDakE sontam.....
Culturally, by tradition it is fixed and established. More over, my wife received nothing till date.
Posted by: Mr. Vachaspathi V At: 30, Nov 2005 2:10:01 PM IST
nE chEsina okka tappu adE. ainA, porapATlu chEyakunDA nErchukOlEm kadA! :)
Anyways, lets stick to this and lets get his answer for this question. Until then, lets not let him to post any thing, but answer to this.
Posted by: Bahud♥♥rapu Baatasaari At: 29, Nov 2005 9:01:29 PM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
