|
|
|
General Forum: Current 'Affairs' | | What is Feminism? | |
| MR,
Not exactly, Actually Femisnist term was coined for social equlity of sexes. I support the cause of suppressed classes. Indian constitution is 'biased' towards suppressed classes. Can I call it as "helping hand?".
And females are with out question are suppressed by double standard value system. You are quoting a particular case, upon which I cant comment. Probably bashing a male dominant society might look as bashing males. And I think we need feminist organisation, not to unite and make slogans against males, but to educate people and erradicate the suppression. Well I am not sure about How the organisations you quoted works.
And I want to know details of those Indian penal codes about adultery of Men and women. Why does society treats differently men and women , about an adultery? I feel most of the time it heavily bashes woman only!
Posted by: Saleem At: 1, Jul 2004 11:24:19 PM IST
lolz
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 1, Jul 2004 1:49:16 PM IST
Lemme quote an instance ...
the fact that the Indian constituion is biased towards the woman .. for instance to prove that a woman is invoved in adultry u need to have fool-proof evidence and in case of a male circumstantial evidence is enough in the Indian Penal Code.
So there was this case at the AP Hight court when a woman misused this law and and also tried to implicate her inlaws in a harassment case .. The court quashed the petition and said " Now a days some women are misusing the lelience given to them" ..
and thats it... organizations like POW and AIDSO were up in arms against court saying that its "anti-women" and that they didnt believe in a male judge .. doesnt it sound Kay Magish?
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 1, Jul 2004 1:42:49 PM IST
I am off to sleep M R & Ms. Kay.. Laterz Tc , Khuda hafiz :)
Posted by: Saleem At: 1, Jul 2004 1:36:53 PM IST
"Fight against whoever holds this discrimanting value system, either Males or females"
There u go again ... if you mean that ..then I dont call you a feminist .. You are an "Equal-Rights" activist and I too support you on that ..
I meant to say I'll always try to resist those feminists ( you may choose to callthem Radical Feminsits in yoru jargon) .. who blame and abuse males for anything and everything .. and my fight with her is a result of that .. she is baiting males and I'm attacking feminists ...
and as you said .. when the whole society is responsible for the discrimination ( that includes males and females) its unfair to blame males alone for that and thats my only point in this whole mess!!
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 1, Jul 2004 1:36:43 PM IST
Right, No 'real' feminist abuse males MR. Thier fight is not against males, their fight is against the society and the supressing value system. Fight against whoever holds this discrimanting value system, either Males or females.
Posted by: Saleem At: 1, Jul 2004 1:29:49 PM IST
Revolting against current value system and discrimination doesnt mean "abusing males" right - Saleem?
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 1, Jul 2004 1:20:17 PM IST
Well Ms. Kay, for many reasons, but not out of sympathy. They have valid reasons to revolt against the current value system. I support those reasons.
Posted by: Saleem At: 1, Jul 2004 1:18:14 PM IST
Organization is doing fine Saleem Bhai .,., thx,, and well about generalization I was just reacting to Kay Mags attacks .. and read the other thread "Abusive Men" .. u'll know what filth a feminist has got!!
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 1, Jul 2004 1:08:52 PM IST
You were generalizing feminists attitude, and attributing something to '-ism'. So just wanted to know what filth a 'feminist' got!
not related to this discussion, btw how is your organization doing? :)
Posted by: Saleem At: 1, Jul 2004 1:03:40 PM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
