|
|
|
General Forum: Current 'Affairs' | | Kanchi Shankaracharya VS Mohammed Naseeruddin | |
| Hey crocy, what happened? u never turned up!!
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 18, Dec 2004 3:13:27 AM IST
LOL NTV
Posted by: Mr. Nagesh Babu Adari At: 17, Dec 2004 7:22:16 PM IST
RSS is not same as VHP Bhaskar garu ... I agree with SDB ...
When they attend the emergency situations like Quakes or Cyclones, they dont distinguish between Hindu and Muslim victims
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 17, Dec 2004 11:49:53 AM IST
I meant nothing. I want to Know what they meant. I mean him who started this thread.
Posted by: Mr. M Kumar N At: 16, Dec 2004 6:21:04 PM IST
Pre incident KS was never compared to any citizen of the India in that case why now????
Posted by: Mr. M Kumar N At: 16, Dec 2004 5:56:08 PM IST
The list is about the politicians & cine actors. They are the same before and sfter the incident.
Why KS is compared to politicians.
you mean to say there is a difference???
What MN is do with this incident??????
Posted by: Mr. M Kumar N At: 16, Dec 2004 5:48:05 PM IST
http://www.eenadu.net/archives/archive-13-12-2004/story.asp?qry1=4&reccount=19
adE vishayam jayEndravishayamlO enduku vartinchadu?
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 16, Dec 2004 2:45:27 PM IST
Now , atleast people here will know what is going on in court.
____________________________________________
hopefully!!!!
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 16, Dec 2004 12:49:25 PM IST
There are evidences to beleive he is guilty. Not to say probably. If it is Probably , can't he get bail under Section 439 ?
__________________________________________
Nope, thats what ...Seer's cousel argued .. he said 437 and 439 should be viewed separately but the Judge refused to separate them and claimed he had limited powers
___________________________________________
In this case also, you were saying there is 50 percent that his involvment is there.
___________________________________________
DID I EVER SAY SANKARACHARYA WAS INNOCENT?
All I said was that He may or May not be guilty and one should wait until the court declares him Guilty!! and its a 50-50 chance that hez guilty / innocent
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 16, Dec 2004 11:56:22 AM IST
This paragraph is very significant in your link .. wow .. u posted a great link anupama garu
_____________________________________________
Mr. Murugesan further said: "Courts, while hearing bail petitions, should act with utmost care and caution, like walking on razor's edge, in not discussing threadbare the merits and demerits of materials and vital aspects of the case. Keeping in mind the settled position of law, this court, hailing the stand of the prosecution, turns down the pleas of the petitioner."
in not discussing threadbare the merits and demerits of materials and vital aspects of the case
Doesnt it mean that the vital aspects have NOT been discussed yet?
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 16, Dec 2004 11:48:16 AM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
