|
|
|
General Forum: Religion | | aadhyaatmika praSnalu | |
| Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 26, May 2006 4:25:58 PM IST
//Have your own interpretation//
ani nEnekkaDa annaanaMDi? right interpretationraavaalaMTE positive thinking unnappuDE vastuMdi annaanaMDi.
mIrilaa "arthaalu" mIku nachchinaTTugaa maarchEstE elaagaMDi?
Posted by: Mrs. shaloo At: 27, May 2006 10:23:32 PM IST
Posted by: Mrs. shaloo At: 23, May 2006 1:59:45 PM IST
Have your own interpretation. :)
nEnu cheppEdi kooDaa adE . saman~vayamu chEsi artham chEsukOvaalanEdi. Edainaa vEda upanishattulaku viruddham kaakunDaa. alaagE ambhraNI suuktam lO lakshmI dEvivi adhInam lO vunna rudra, brahma anTE rudruDanTE kailaasa patianiyuu, brahma anTE chaturmuKa brahma aniyuu artham chEyaali. endukanTE aataruvaata " naa I Saktiki aasamudraSayanuDaina vishNuvE kaaraNuDu " ani vastundi kaabaTTi. I renDu SabdaalakI paramaatma ayina vishNuvu ani artham cheyyakuuDadu. chEstE paramaatmuDiki evaruu kaaraNuDu lEDu anE vEda, upanishattulaki vyatiriktamgaa vunTundi kaabaTTi (Which is absurd)
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 26, May 2006 4:25:58 PM IST
Posted by: Mrs. Anupama K At: 24, May 2006 4:44:11 PM IST
kaani chikku aMtaa ekkaDa vastuMdaMTE,
one sect (religion) has ine particular form of ritual,and thinks that is holy,while the rituals of another sect are simply superstitiuos.
for ex:
1.The chrstians think When God came in the form of "dove" it was alright,but if he comes in the form of "fish" as the Hindus say , it is superstitious.And visaversa.
2.The Jews think if an idol be made in the form of chest with angels sitting on it etcc.. it is all right,but in the form of man it is awful.And visa versa.
3.The muslims think that when they pray.if they try to form a mental image of the darga with Kaaba, the black stone in it nd turn towards west,it is all right, but if you form the image in the shape of church it is idoltary.And visaversa.
This seems foolish talk.Ritualism is good as far as it helps man SPRITUALLY.IF THEY DONT HELP MAN TO OPEN THEIR HEARTS TO GOD AND BECOME MORE LIBERAL,THE MAN DEGENERATES,RETROGRADES AND GO IN RETARD PROGRESS LIKE OSAMAA...
All religions at one point agree that their God is -----ultimate,eternal, protector,omnipotent,saviour etc.The highest ideal is God.And this is the common point in all "their particular Gods".Then why not we agree in the others faith in their God.A simple logic.
Posted by: Keerty At: 24, May 2006 5:50:04 PM IST
oppukOvaalaMTE positive mind kaavaali kadamDi.
Posted by: Mrs. shaloo At: 25, May 2006 12:39:52 PM IST
Posted by: Mr. jogarao pilla At: 24, May 2006 9:23:03 PM IST
How are you Sir Pilla gaaru? yes you are correct
but if we discuss on a topic the real facts comes out and the knowledge will be strengthen....that is going here
Posted by: Mr. Bhaskar At: 25, May 2006 0:06:12 AM IST
It appears that a nice discussion is going on here.
Let me contribute my point.
I feel that one need not look outside for God. God is residing in the Human heart, but concealed Himself and exposed us.We need to become insignificant ourselves and expose God in us by developing love and devotion and treat every one else as our own brother /sister.In such situation there is no necessity for any one to criticise the other or his/ her faith or following.Then everything will be alright.
Posted by: Mr. jogarao pilla At: 24, May 2006 9:23:03 PM IST
anupama u saying right
good,
god has given u birth to you in some it may be hindu or muslim or anything what ur duty is to follow them correctly,
and what i am saying that,
this type thought will only occur in hinduism only, but more ristricted in muslim is ir right or wrong?
Posted by: Mr. kirankumarreddy bandikadi At: 24, May 2006 4:53:19 PM IST
hello iam new to this rooom,
i want to express my fealings
i think the hinduisam is developped by people, there is no force like in islam to prey god daily, so there is lot of scope to innovativeness in hinduisam is it right or wrong,
the ultimate border line in hindu is that do good and get good
is it right or wrong ?
Posted by: Mr. kirankumarreddy bandikadi At: 24, May 2006 4:49:59 PM IST
Posted by: Mrs. Anupama K At: 23, May 2006 5:23:00 PM IST
1."Right interpretation" of knowledge depends on positive attitude.Only This "positive attitude" can give peace to mind and world.
2.All religions at one point agree that their God is -----ultimate,eternal, protector,omnipotent,saviour etc.The highest ideal is God.And this is the common point in all "their particular Gods".Then why not we agree in the others faith in their God.A simple logic.
And this "Greatness of all religion Gods" must not be hampered by any kind of limitation.How foolishly we tend to put restrictions on God.We assert that God cannot be this or cannot be that when He is the whole.
When we beleive in this we never say who is the ultimate.
ippuDu cheppamDi nijamugaa evarineinaa, e matamuvaaLLaneinaa "kaaphirlu aMTaamaa?"
Posted by: Mrs. shaloo At: 24, May 2006 1:18:27 PM IST
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 20, May 2006 9:41:41 AM IST
bhaashaa parijNjaanamu okkaTe kaadamDi.sareina interpretation chaala mukhyamu.
chinna udaaharaNa:
"kaaphir " aMTE urdU bhaashalO The feeling of gratitude is so important that a non-believer is called 'kafir' which means 'one who denies a truth' and also 'one who is ungrateful.'
imta satyaanni paTTukoni "naa allah ni nammani vaaDu "kaaphir ani vitamDavaadaalu----
allah , jIssessu,vishNu edeinaa evareinaa mana nammakamu.asalu"dEvuDu" concept --God is the protector,the ultimate.He is one. idi arthameina vaaDu naa aallha , naa vishNu ani EnaaDu anaDu. aninavaaDu nijameina "kaaphir ".
oka church keLLina, oka dargaa ki veLLinaa ,oka guDi kiveLLina oka anirvachanIyameina anubHUti.oka nammakamu.oka satyamu.That is God .
Posted by: Mrs. shaloo At: 23, May 2006 1:59:45 PM IST
Posted by: Keerty At: 21, May 2006 5:29:46 AM IST
kathaavaahini lO pOshTuchEsaanu chuusu kOnDi
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 22, May 2006 2:30:50 PM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
