|
|
|
General Forum: Current 'Affairs' | | Kanchi Shankaracharya VS Mohammed Naseeruddin | |
| But, still judge said there were evidences to beleive . Analysation will be done later at trial.
___________________________________________
U said it ... so that means that the judge said, "there is some evidence ... probably he is guilty .. but the validity of the evidence will be established only after the analysis"
that means if it comes out at alater stage that the evidence is invalid, the Seer can e declared NOT GUILTY!!!! So its a 50-50 chance and Court has NOT YET DECIDED that he is guilty
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 16, Dec 2004 11:39:08 AM IST
A Bail plea can be Rejected on Reasonable grounds, I doubt whether a sentence can be Delivered on Reasonable ground s.. not sur e.. for someone to decide he is guilty there should be a strong ground ... atleast according to our IPC
|
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 16, Dec 2004 11:36:32 AM IST
*** "reasonable grounds to believe that he was guilty" ***
Thats what I said .. The word REASONABLE is critical here ... it means the Evidence is not perfect but kind of sufficient .. that say sit all
There is a looot of difference between saying
"There is a reason to Belive Sankaracharya is guilty" and saying
"I belive sankaracharya is guilty"
One uses the word Reasonable when one is not yet sure about how strong the belief is
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 16, Dec 2004 11:33:54 AM IST
But well well well wait a minute .. your link has an interesting paragarph
_____________________________
As for Mr. Dinakaran's argument that the confession of a co-accused was not binding on other accused, the Judge said: "Considering the position in the light of Supreme Court decisions, the evidentiary value of the prosecution case can be decided only at the time of trial. So, at this stage, the merit of the evidence cannot be analysed."
___________________________________________
and one more
___________________________
As regards the admissibility of these materials, he said, "it is pertinent to point out that at the budding stage of investigation, it is neither necessary for the prosecution to divulge and declare, nor can be expected {lcub}to do so{rcub}, the minutest details. It is enough and would suffice if a broad picture of the involvement of the petitioner is brought out and depicted."
SO THE BAIL PLEA COULD BE REJECTED, EVEN IF THERE IS A DEPICTION OF A BROAD PICTURE OF INVOLVEMENT ..
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 16, Dec 2004 11:30:34 AM IST
newayz this is a different case altogether ... I wasnt talking about this
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 16, Dec 2004 11:22:43 AM IST
yeah 6 others as well saying there is evidence ... but the sentence about Seer ended in the previous paragraph .
its not clear from the newspaper whether it referred to 6 or 6+1
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 16, Dec 2004 11:20:57 AM IST
This is the link I was talking about http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/000200412081501.htm
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 16, Dec 2004 11:14:05 AM IST
Is that statement not saying that there are evidences to beleive that they were guilty of an offence ? Hm ?
______________________________________________
And what do u mean by "They" here .. ?
The 6 others or Sankaracharya + 6 others?
the newspaper doesnt say that
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 16, Dec 2004 11:12:05 AM IST
I was talking about Sankararaman Murder case, not Radhakrishnan assault case
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 16, Dec 2004 11:08:54 AM IST
That was not the story I posted. I posted the Text of the Judgement as written in hindu on December 8 .. and yours is DATED December 11th .. AND THIS IS RELATED TO ASSAULT CASE NOT THE MURDER CASE
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 16, Dec 2004 11:07:48 AM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
