|
|
|
General Forum: Information Technology | | Doubt ... | |
| Hi Madhu,
Further, we have already got this info from our past experience with the system as I could able to touch the problem and no link aggregations taking place.
Anyways, the ports would not validate from the systems end.
Let me know some info that follows:
Have u heard abt AutoSys tool from Computer associates proprietory.. for Job automation kinda thing! Can we have our regular job automated on periodically for which we need not check for the tasks that are running successfully or not!!
Pls revert back if more info req for the request...
Cheers,
Kiran
Posted by: Mr. Kiran Reddy At: 12, Sep 2003 8:21:14 AM IST
hi Kiran...
Thank you very much ...but no need 2 chk that now...i got the awnser.
herez the expalnation reg' that...
when u try to create a vlan with two ports in two different Link Aggregations, OR when u try to create a Link Aggregation with two ports in two differnt VLANs, the Command line interface should restrict the entry or if u r using SNMP it should validate the values thr & should reject the entry. It is not possible to valdiate this in either Link aggreagtaion module or in VLAN module.
:-)
Thank you 4 spending time on this
Madhu
Posted by: Mrs. MadhaviReddy Madhu At: 8, Sep 2003 5:55:16 PM IST
Hi Madhu,
Firstly, regret 4 the late response as i was in travel to abroad for a month and half, so i have a bit less touch with TP.com.
well! reg the abt 'LinkAggregation & VLAN related testcase', I would definetly check the case in here!, n 'll let u know more details.
As ever,
Kiran
Posted by: Mr. Kiran Reddy At: 2, Sep 2003 3:53:29 PM IST
hey kiran ....
rem'ber ...the doubt i posted here, abt LinkAggregation & VLAN related testcase? ...
Can u plz chk in ur Lab thr? & lemme know the result ...if possible :-)
bye
Madhu
Posted by: Mrs. MadhaviReddy Madhu At: 28, Aug 2003 8:31:47 AM IST
Thanks 4 the suggestion & advice.
I have noted the remarks for the Ques that am looking for..
Here we go :
Router(CONFIG)#NO IP DOMAIN-LOOKUP
and des worked fine..
Thanks all !!
Kiran
Posted by: Mr. Kiran Reddy At: 29, Jul 2003 8:14:26 PM IST
no idea,post ur question here u will get information.
http://www.experts-exchange.com
Posted by: Mr. Sreenivasa Reddy V At: 28, Jul 2003 3:58:22 PM IST
no idea kiran :-)
Posted by: Mrs. MadhaviReddy Madhu At: 26, Jul 2003 5:18:40 PM IST
Hi MAdhavi,
That was a peculiar problem that one of our client side which is immaterial for.Anyways thankQ very much for keep track of the case.Now the case is closed.
How can you turn of host name resolution in router?
Hi Sreenivas,
Let me know if the info provided is helpful?.
Cheers,
K....
Posted by: Mr. Kiran Reddy At: 26, Jul 2003 9:38:10 AM IST
accha kiran...
In our stack software v dinn get this type of prob. as per my knowlege ...ok ... so prob' solve ayyindha?
Posted by: Mrs. MadhaviReddy Madhu At: 26, Jul 2003 8:53:38 AM IST
When a switch decides where the frame should be sent, it passes the frame out the appropriate port (or ports). You can think of a switch as a device creating instantaneous connections between various ports, on a frame-by-frame basis.
Use #show interface (interface name) on router, to determine an interface utilization. Several fields will help you here like Load, Packets Input/Output, and so on..
try this, pls revert back if you have any concerns,
Hi Madhavi,
FYI !!. When you look at the port status, it will read "errDisable." You must fix the configuration problem and then manually take the port out of errDisable state. Some newer software versions and later—have the capability to automatically re-enable a port after a configurable amount of time spent in the errDisable state..
As ever,
Kiran
Posted by: Mr. Kiran Reddy At: 25, Jul 2003 6:51:47 PM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
