|
|
|
Cinema Special: Heros | | Uday Kiran, my favourite star. | |
| hello Mr. VSK Sarma garu,
that is what i am saying with only cute looks anybody can't become good actor. U explained very good about what is action. I agree with u. That is where i give DVSK as an example for NTR'S action.
And here we r not discussing about ethics. We r taking about cinemas. So as u say i am the right to critisize anybody when i can't like their acting. That's where i critisized uday as i can't find anything in his acting. I think u understand. Anyway it is a good discussion.
--- kiran
Posted by: Mr. kiran reddy At: 10, May 2004 10:56:08 PM IST
well Mr kiran reddy gaaru,
I have not been trying to prove uday as best or NTR as worst. I have been trying to say that there are many better actors in our telugu industry and you can't rate one among them as best.
Action is nothing but expression. Expression comes by feeling. Feeling only comes when you understand the concept and charecter to the extreme. when you (means any actor) don't have very good understanding of character you can't do justice to the role. I think you are understanding why did i spent my valuble time in my last mail.
My logic is that when I have better understanding of ethics and some one who is enacting the role had wrong conception about the role I have every right to criticize.
I am not interested in comparitive discussion between actors. Being normal spectators we need to think.
If you have to say some one as best there is a criteria. In which concept he is best.
Any ways
stay chilled
Sarma
Posted by: Mr. Indian proud At: 1, May 2004 1:21:00 PM IST
Hello Mr. venkata subrahmanya kambhampati sarma garu,
Just compare ur answer with my questions is there any relation between my topic and ur topic. Here we r not discussing anything about our etics.
i think these r unnecessary answers.
BHISHMA is baseless in this movie.
YUDHISTIR,DHARMARAJ (named after dharma) does adharma and he won't be able answer droupadi's questions.
VIDURA is just a spectator.
DROUPADI, seeking karna as 6th husband
Here we r not talking anything about etics we just talking about movies and actors. if u want to argue in these topics then it is better to start another group. There i can definately give the answers to ur questions. but not here. I think u never prove uday as a better actor by these argues. If u can prove NTR or Chiru r not better actors than uday then i can argue with u. If u want to argue with me on etics just start another group. then i came there.
just see ur views acoring to my questions.
I don't know how far you know about our mahabharata epic. DVSK was directred by NTR (so called the best by you).
Mahabharat was written to describe the very basic charecters of humanbeing. You can not find any dharma or scientific fiction or political tactics which are not there in it. When you direct some movie basing on such epic you are supposed to do atleast justice to the characters. I don't know how many times you watched that movie. I have atleast watched it for 15 times where I can find flaws with each character.
Karna's charecter is very good and he knows dharmas better than any one else. when duryodhana charecter comes in you might have liked the dialogues. But do you know how idiotic dialogues those were and how foolish to support such anti-Hindu movies.
As per this movie.
BHISHMA is baseless in this movie.
YUDHISTIR,DHARMARAJ (named after dharma) does adharma and he won't be able answer droupadi's questions.
VIDURA is just a spectator.
DROUPADI, seeking karna as 6th husband (don't you think how foolish it is).
I don't know whether you have comparision or not between SVR (KEECHAKA in NARTANASALA) and NTR (KEECHAKA in VIRATAPARVAM). Have you seen kanaysulkam? Girisam character was enacted by ramanamurthy in kanyasulkam PLAY several times and NTR in the movie. You will know whether he has done justice or not.
I think you might not have seen tamil movies much. sivaji ganeshan (action seems to be little bit over) 's dialog delivery is the best and his actions is said to be the mile stone for some characters.
Have you seen haranadh enacting rama/krishna roles????
Don't go by tabloids or on some one's views to say some one as best?
Have you seen lavakusha movie? It was not hit due to NTR's action. It is due to lava and kusha's characters.
If you observer his dialogs you can see stress where it is not necessary. I don't know how much knowledge people have to accept such language killing dialaogues.
I can give number of such example for you if you want know more about such lucky popular people.
Cheers----Sarma
Posted by: Mr. venkata subrahmanya kambhampati sarma At: 30, Apr 2004 0:46:13 AM IST
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello Mr. venkata subrahmanya kambhampati sarma garu,
So u say NTR is not a good actor. Can u tell me one role skipped by him or not done the justice by him. If his dialogue delivery is not good then how he became NO 1 hero in telugu film industry for a period of 30 years. He played all the roles in indian epics and done the justice to those characters. If he can't do the justice to those characters like rama and krishna then y still people treat him as rama and krishna.one more thing u saw the movie DVSK(daana veera soora kanna) any telugu actor not telugu any indian actor can delivar the dialogue more powerful than him like for the character duryodana. I can't agree with u by fate and good looks anybody can't become more popular. By the hardwork and dedication towards work can only makes them good and popular.
-- kiran
Posted by: Mr. kiran reddy At: 1, May 2004 0:55:36 AM IST
Better to hold the tongue while speaking in public. Any thing can be disproven any time except the facts which are trivial. I am one among the public. Don't generalize the issues when you don't have enough witness to defend......
Any ways nice to see you all online...
Unnecessary and unhealthy topics.
cheers to you all
Sarma
Posted by: Mr. Indian proud At: 30, Apr 2004 9:19:29 PM IST
Hello kiran reddy garu,
I don't know how far you know about our mahabharata epic. DVSK was directred by NTR (so called the best by you).
Mahabharat was written to describe the very basic charecters of humanbeing. You can not find any dharma or scientific fiction or political tactics which are not there in it. When you direct some movie basing on such epic you are supposed to do atleast justice to the characters. I don't know how many times you watched that movie. I have atleast watched it for 15 times where I can find flaws with each character.
Karna's charecter is very good and he knows dharmas better than any one else. when duryodhana charecter comes in you might have liked the dialogues. But do you know how idiotic dialogues those were and how foolish to support such anti-Hindu movies.
As per this movie.
BHISHMA is baseless in this movie.
YUDHISTIR,DHARMARAJ (named after dharma) does adharma and he won't be able answer droupadi's questions.
VIDURA is just a spectator.
DROUPADI, seeking karna as 6th husband (don't you think how foolish it is).
I don't know whether you have comparision or not between SVR (KEECHAKA in NARTANASALA) and NTR (KEECHAKA in VIRATAPARVAM). Have you seen kanaysulkam? Girisam character was enacted by ramanamurthy in kanyasulkam PLAY several times and NTR in the movie. You will know whether he has done justice or not.
I think you might not have seen tamil movies much. sivaji ganeshan (action seems to be little bit over) 's dialog delivery is the best and his actions is said to be the mile stone for some characters.
Have you seen haranadh enacting rama/krishna roles????
Don't go by tabloids or on some one's views to say some one as best?
Have you seen lavakusha movie? It was not hit due to NTR's action. It is due to lava and kusha's characters.
If you observer his dialogs you can see stress where it is not necessary. I don't know how much knowledge people have to accept such language killing dialaogues.
I can give number of such example for you if you want know more about such lucky popular people.
Cheers----Sarma
Posted by: Mr. Indian proud At: 29, Apr 2004 10:46:13 PM IST
Hello Mr. venkata subrahmanya kambhampati sarma garu,
So u say NTR is not a good actor. Can u tell me one role skipped by him or not done the justice by him. If his dialogue delivery is not good then how he became NO 1 hero in telugu film industry for a period of 30 years. He played all the roles in indian epics and done the justice to those characters. If he can't do the justice to those characters like rama and krishna then y still people treat him as rama and krishna.one more thing u saw the movie DVSK(daana veera soora kanna) any telugu actor not telugu any indian actor can delivar the dialogue more powerful than him like for the character duryodana. I can't agree with u by fate and good looks anybody can't become more popular. By the hardwork and dedication towards work can only makes them good and popular.
-- kiran
Posted by: Mr. kiran reddy At: 29, Apr 2004 0:19:32 AM IST
Hello kiran garu,
Don't say that popularity is measure to be a good actor. Can you tell me the best dialogue teller of telugu cini industry? It is neither NTR(Sr) or Chiru. It is only SV Rangarao who used to deliver any kind of telugu dialogue in his own style and to the perfection.
We should see the attitude of actors too. Chiru had never enacted a role where real telugu language comes in to power. NTR (Sr) has enacted many roles which were distracting our epics and other dharmas. I can't really accept him as a good actor too. An artist is he who gives moral boost up to traditions and differentiates good/evil by his skills.
Might be they are good among the worst. But there are some actors (SVR,somayajulu etc) who has given good repuation to telugu language and their art too.....
Posted by: Mr. Indian proud At: 27, Apr 2004 10:32:45 PM IST
Hello prasanthi gaaru,
with cute looks and with lover boy image no one can't became a good actor. First tell ur uday to became a good actor. I definately say he never became more popular and great actor than chiru. chiru is always chiru. i feel in andhra there is only 2 gr8 and popular actors. NTR(Sr) and Chiru apart from them no one can't became more popular.
Posted by: Mr. kiran reddy At: 27, Apr 2004 1:09:38 AM IST
I like his beauty, grace, charm, smile and laugh also. His B'day is also the same day as mine.
Posted by: Ms. Prasanthi Uppalapati At: 17, Apr 2004 7:56:25 PM IST
i like his simplicity...
Posted by: Ms. Adupa At: 17, Apr 2004 3:31:03 AM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
