|
|
|
General Forum: Love | | Role of a Wife - A question about it | |
| Jharna mee answers baagundaayi except naa statement ki tappiste(Just kidding.Have fun.I said my opinions only below.If u agree or not its up to you.).Have fun.
Posted by: Mr. santhosh vemuri At: 24, Jan 2004 9:03:17 AM IST
Jharna
//Why can't they be proud of their beauty when they CAN BE proud of their good nature et al?//
The above is yr response to my comment.I am only appreciating the things which comes through some effort by the individual(Ex is good nature).I dont appreciate what ever comes with birth(such as beauty).If you are beautiful it doesnot make sense to society,it makes sense to yr partner only.So the effect is less here only to single individual.If you have good nature society will be benefited.people learn from you,emulate you and try to follow good people.also as good nature means helping not hurting harming etc definitely surroundings will be happy,who ever you interacts.Its ridiculous to be proud of one's own beauty and u know that beauty lies in the eyes of beholder.If soembody loves somebody even ugly person will look beautiful to him.I am not saying u should nt be worried about being beautiful in life.yes beauty makes more physically attracted so love making will be often and so fun will be more.But what i am saying u just leave that matter,dont be proud of that,because u know if you are proud and humiliate ugly people,they will be suffered.they will be so sad in life because they are not beautiful.u know if everybody marries beautiful people,then how non beautiful people get married.Its the inner beauty is important.beauty is not constant and loses with old age or not eating ,health problems or due to accidents etc .Also in dark u wont see anybody beauty or not.In old age love matters most between partners.people will be attracted to beauty till certain age only.Not after that.its natural that if we are beauty somebody will see us so we feel better.our mind feels better.but that is not constant.we cant stop old age.at that time real love matters and at that time real inner beauty matters like helping ,nice to everybody,never hurting etc.If love not there between couples beautys value is waste.People dont get interested to touch or to be touched.Happiness lies in our mind only.If we think somebody beautiful and make love ,the same fun comes.I am not saying people to be not beautiful,but dont be proud because it may hurt somebody who are ugly.If you are proud of beauty people dont respect also,we become more egoistic too,Instead of that you can be proud of what we achieved,if people change their natures in due course of time and become good people,then its achievement so you worked hard and so there is some sense to think that we are proud of our achievements.But great people or god not be egoistic at this time also,they will be stoic always.But i am talking about average guys so theres no wrong to be proud of the things they achieved.You just visualise that if anybody is ugly and they see somebody beautiful people proud of their beauty,then they go sadness because they cant be beautiful, as people not paying attention or admiring their beauty or following them.May be with the advent of plastic surgeons some form of beautiness may be possible,but not everything we get.also people dont have money to do that surgeries.madam what i am saying is dont do anything which is hurting to anybody.we have to be simple in life.you might think that as i am writing like this i am not beautiful and so with jealousy i am writing like this.I am good looking guy only but i never be proud of beauty never.My statements are not intended to you.Even if i written based on yr comments its not intended to you in particular,to the whole society posing question.what ever i said You here means, people thats it.If my statements doesnot make sense ignore this message.But i always appreciate anybodys criticisms if they have any.dont think i am doing showy business here only giving statements and not following.I am also not proud of my things like helping,less selfish,non harming ,compassionate,thoughtful,sensitive to surroundings etc etc.THose things came with birth to me and never achieved anything more after that.So i wont be proud at all.I am an average guy .I am an average guy.god bless you and everybody
Posted by: Mr. santhosh vemuri At: 24, Jan 2004 6:57:57 AM IST
Vachaspati garu,
Don't (Can't) liberty and discipline go together?
=============
Nautical Nonsense,
((((@jharna
shrugging from someones duties ,is always a catastrophe .If a woman isnt the back bone,i have a feeling that any man cant be sucessful.)))))
--True. I agree. That is what everyone says and what has been showed in the movie that I referred to, very well. Why did she take up such a responsibility? ok. That question doesn't make much sense.
What is she getting in return for that responsibility? Why isn't she getting the respect that she deserves for being the 'backbone' of a family?
(((((arguments can be made as to a woman being a front runner ,and a man being the back bone of the whole setup.but ,i am very much septical about that role .))))
-- I am not arguing for the setup u mentioned. But, I find it interesting that are you sceptical about it. Why Nautical?
Posted by: Mr. NaUtIcAl NoNsEnSe At: 22, Jan 2004 10:27:08 PM IST
=========
(((I feel no body should be proud of their beauty,instead they can be proud of their good nature,achievements(but ideal person is pride-less,ego less all the times,but we talk about the common people).My opinions only.Sorry if hurted anybody.))))))
-- Why can't they be proud of their beauty when they CAN BE proud of their good nature et al?
And I didn't understand the relevance of your statement in this context.
Also, you needn't be sorry for having an opinion Mr. Santosh. :-)
(((((The role of a wife is same as the role of a husband as they both are human beings only(one not animal and another not human being HA HA,just for fun).Isn't this answer simpler than any.Ofcourse right man.Take it lightly guys my comments.Have fun.If both work together,life will be smoother ))))))
---- I agree to what you said. But why is the woman pushed behind the curtain and not letting her out? Why is she restricted to being the 'back bone'? Why isn't she coming out? What makes her stick to that responsibility which doesn't yield enough returns?
Posted by: Mr. santhosh vemuri At: 23, Jan 2004 11:59:01 AM IST
==============
(((((OK got it Jharna.
And I agree with you, indisciplined freedon is dangerous.
Well, VeVa always think of womam liberty. What he feels is, as per my understading, a woman should ride a bike with micro skirt and freak out with men in pubs and clubs, ignoring house-hold responsibilities and her own kids(as a matter of fact, no marriage is required, as marriage is a bonded labour in his view). Correct me if I'm wrong, Mr VeVa! Thats what VeVa dreams all about... the society where women does what ever men does.)))))
---- vastra dhaarana ku, ee topic ku pedda sambandham ledandi Durga Prasad garu. evariki edi nachite adi vesuku tirugutaaru.
When you said 'a society where women does whatever men do', do you mean that men can do whatever you have mentioned above but women can't? Can a man ignore his house-hold responsibility - by spending time in clubs, playing sports while his wife and kids wait for him? Isn't he ignoring his kids? There are thousands of men in India who do that. Why can't a woman do that Durga Prasad garu? And if you say, yes, then isn't marriage nothing but a bonded labour?
naa prasna ade, bharta alaa cheyyagalugutunnappudu, bhaarya enduku cheyyalekapotondi? aame ni emi aaputondi?
================
((((( woman /wife /freedom. isthe vachedi kadu swecha(freedom). enjoy. strech the mind)))))
---- I totally agree to that.
Posted by: Mr. guess u know anonymous At: 23, Jan 2004 8:44:01 PM IST
===========
((((((Women are treated like slaves with no rights in Indian society. The situation of women will never improve because narrow minded guys like you always tend to support it.))))))))
--- True Finch. And the women don't even know that. They are put on a pedestal, given statements such as 'they can't be easily understood' alienating them from themselves giving them a complex. Creating sayings such as 'way to man's heart is his stomach' and restricting them to homes and kitchen and so, again, alienating them from the happenings around them.
Posted by: Finch Atticus At: 23, Jan 2004 9:12:41 PM IST
===============
And my question remains the same, what are these women holding on to when they are doing such a good job at fulfilling their 'responsibility' of being the back-bone of a family?
Posted by: Jharna At: 24, Jan 2004 0:28:40 AM IST
ramana maharshi aaSramam lO chEritE emayyindee? stree akkdinunDe maLLee mudrinchalEdaa?
Posted by: Saleem At: 23, Jan 2004 9:53:10 PM IST
DP,
Veva is showing a concern for women which you do not have. Stop abusing him.
Women are treated like slaves with no rights in Indian society. The situation of women will never improve because narrow minded guys like you always tend to support it.
If you use your brain to think what Veva is saying you will very well understand what he is trying to imply.
Posted by: Finch Atticus At: 23, Jan 2004 8:15:14 PM IST
Nautical,
Cant man be successful without women being his backbone?
Where did you get this theory from?
Or are you talking about just yourself?
Posted by: Finch Atticus At: 23, Jan 2004 8:12:41 PM IST
OK got it Jharna.
And I agree with you, indisciplined freedon is dangerous.
Well, VeVa always think of womam liberty. What he feels is, as per my understading, a woman should ride a bike with micro skirt and freak out with men in pubs and clubs, ignoring house-hold responsibilities and her own kids(as a matter of fact, no marriage is required, as marriage is a bonded labour in his view). Correct me if I'm wrong, Mr VeVa! Thats what VeVa dreams all about... the society where women does what ever men does.
Posted by: Durga Prasad At: 23, Jan 2004 1:17:18 PM IST
I feel no body should be proud of their beauty,instead they can be proud of their good nature,achievements(but ideal person is pride-less,ego less all the times,but we talk about the common people).My opinions only.Sorry if hurted anybody.
The role of a wife is same as the role of a husband as they both are human beings only(one not animal and another not human being HA HA,just for fun).Isn't this answer simpler than any.Ofcourse right man.Take it lightly guys my comments.Have fun.If both work together,life will be smoother
Posted by: Mr. santhosh vemuri At: 23, Jan 2004 10:59:01 AM IST
Vachaspati garu,
Doesn't liberty need to be disciplined? Indisciplined freedom is dangerous. Isn't it?
Durga Prasad garu,
I was talking about self discipline. Wearing a chudidaar or anything doesn't really matter, unless it is her decision to do it. What you say implies discipline imposed by others.
The goal of all these married women in India was the total good and growth of their family.
Mr. Nautical Nonsense,
What made her take up such responsibility?What if she shrugs her responsibility of being the back bone of the family?
Aruna garu,
I really didnot have an answer to the question I posed.
anduvallanE praSna tO ApEsAnu. What did they all hang on to?
Mr. Nautical Nonsense,
What made her take up such responsibility?What if she shrugs her responsibility of being a back bone?
Posted by: Jharna At: 22, Jan 2004 9:08:06 PM IST
My question still the same :D
Posted by: Saleem At: 22, Jan 2004 7:33:40 PM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
