|
|
|
General Forum: Religion | | THE CREATION | |
| well,
the beliefs in everybody's hearts are so firmly rooted that they cannot be easily changed.that is the basic problem here.whatever i say, it seems to me as impeccable and you are finding faults in them.i do not really understand why this simple truth of "ekameva adveetayam" (only one,no second thing)is not comprehended by everybody.may be your level and my level of spiritual sadhana are not equal.that is the reason why there is no agreement.as for me, there is no trace of doubt in my mind about "adwaita".
i am an engineering final yr student in gitam college ,vizag.
i would like to know about all of you as well.can you please let me know....
bye everybody.
Posted by: Mr. venkata subrahmanyam oruganti At: 21, Feb 2004 8:04:28 PM IST
better than the worst!
Posted by: Mr. jogarao pilla At: 20, Feb 2004 10:53:12 AM IST
it is stated by my master in one of his writings to stress the importance of human life which alone is capable of bringing the present creation as it is today!
Understood he write crap my dear.
Posted by: Finch Atticus At: 20, Feb 2004 10:51:05 AM IST
it is stated by my master in one of his writings to stress the importance of human life which alone is capable of bringing the present creation as it is today!
Posted by: Mr. jogarao pilla At: 20, Feb 2004 10:43:05 AM IST
I heard that the human birth is the result of evolutionary development of a Jeevi who crossed 84 lakh births before finally taking up the human body, and if he wants to get over this cycle of births and deaths further he needs to realise his original self through his own mind at an elevated stage and that is the purpose of creation- to perpetuate one's own existence through self realisation.
Posted by: Mr. jogarao pilla At: 20, Feb 2004 10:30:11 AM IST
If I can deviate:
Whats is ur basic udnerstanding "survival of fittest"?
Posted by: Saleem At: 20, Feb 2004 9:37:35 AM IST
hello everybody,
what a tremendous response from everybody! also what a prompt
response!but in that the saddest thing is that all of you together
had successfully deviated from the topic.i expexted only raghuji to
give any response.anyway as we have deviated from the topic into
darwin's theory,i would just like to know all of your opinions on
that theory.
personally, i feel that darwin's theory of "survival of the
fittest" is wrong.may be it is true in case of animals but not in the
case of humanbeings.the best people who had ever lived on earth
reached higher planes of wisdom not through killing others but
through sacrifice and so the word fittest should not mean physical
strength as darwin meant.it should be mental wisdom rather.
coming to the hot topic, i would like to just give a small eg
eg:there are two animals.one is an elephant and the other is a dog.
the elephant forgot that it is elephant and thinking that it is dog.
now, what should anybody do to make both of them elephants.
for the elephant wich is thinking that it is a dog,what anybody should
do is just to tell it that it is elephant only and not dog i.e.he has
to just change the elephant's perception.here no physical change is
taking place ,just elephant is getting realisation.
on the other hand, if anyone wants to change the dog to elephant, it
is impossible because dog and elephant are two different things.
SIMILARLY,
if we say that there are two different things viz. god and man,
then as man is not god , he can never realise god.and in that case all
sadhanas are meaningless.the thing is that there is only god and
man has forgotten his divine nature.all these sadhanas are to recollect
his divine nature and to get that realisation is a herculean task.
if man is not god, he can never realise god!
the quality of brahman is "maya".just as we cannot separate
sweetness from sugar (its quality), so as we cannot separate maya
from brahman.
that is the basic difference between an ordinary man and avatars.
lord krishna knows that he is god , so maya is under his control and
so he can do any miracles in this ephemeral world .where as we dont
know that truth ,so we are under the control of maya and so we are
under its destiny.this is the basic "LAW OF MIRACLES".
further if we say that there are two entities, then brahman is no
more can be called as "INFINITE" and it also means that there is some
place where there is no brahman and at some time there is no brahman.
OK! ALL OF YOU WHO ARE FOLLOWING THIS DISCUSSION CLOSELY,PLEASE
GIVE YOUR VALUABLE OPINIONS ON THIS TOPIC.
Posted by: Mr. venkata subrahmanyam oruganti At: 20, Feb 2004 9:30:46 AM IST
MA lo biology,zoology subjects vuntaayaa???
Posted by: Mrs. Aruna At: 19, Feb 2004 2:54:48 PM IST
I am also very very much curious to know.keep going.
Posted by: Mr. santhosh vemuri At: 19, Feb 2004 7:35:13 AM IST
Great topic man.I love to follow this discussion and thereby gaining knoweldge.Please participate and i am thankful to everybody for your valuable inputs.
Posted by: Mr. santhosh vemuri At: 19, Feb 2004 7:33:39 AM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
