|
|
|
General Forum: Religion | | Reality of family bonds ... | |
| Posted by: Mr. surya prakki At: 14, Jul 2007 2:17:38 PM IST
// If the individuals give the conclusions, what is the use of people going to the courts? It will not be acceptable at all because each one will say that their own argument is correct//
mari nuvvu chEstunna nirvaakam EmiTaTa? guruvindaginja laaga
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 14, Jul 2007 4:25:10 PM IST
Posted by: Mr. surya prakki At: 14, Jul 2007 2:17:38 PM IST
mIrappuDu vunDi vyaasualavaarini, jaimini vaarini chuusaaraa suryaajI! pichchi pichchikuutalu kaTTipeTTu.
manDanamiSruniki Sankaraachaaryulavaariki jaDjigaa vyavaharinchinadi manDanamiSruni bhaarya ayina sarasvati. kaavaalanTE guugul serch lO ' manDanamiSra' anikoTTi chuusukOgalaru evarainaa! appuDE aametO kaamaSaastraalu vaadinchaDaniki Sankarulu oka raaju SarIramulO parakaayapravESamu chEsi aaraajabhaaryala vadda kaamasuutraalu nErchukoni vaadanakostaaru. aTupimmaTa aapaapanivRuttikai narasimha stuti chEstaaru
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 14, Jul 2007 4:09:45 PM IST
"when Shankara and Mandana Mishra"
oh!ok! so u r shankara-reincarnated!!
friends! look at this fella's height of adacity. this fucker is not even fit for playing dog's role, compares himself with sankaracharya!!
===
"If the individuals give the conclusions"
hey fucker! how did u forget that u only told "according to US, these r incarnations". is that not a conclusion by a fucking individual(s)??
===
"what is the use of people going to the courts?"
ur fucking stupidity continues. u hv dealt with Animal Planet channel, commerce, grammar n now here u r with courts. go on fucker, go on. bring ur asshole's bedroom details also!!
===
"It will not be acceptable at all because each one will say that their own argument is correct"
yea! fuckers like u only continue to say mIsalaki maTTaMTalEdu even though all ur holes got fucked hard by rock-solid proofs.
===
why the hell u run away from my challenges?
where is ur explanation on avatara, runam, samsaram words? why the hell u shut ur ugly mouth on gopika n goloka? where the fuck is ur grammar in condemning my "daivo matruhu, daivo pitruhu" argument?
where the fuck is ur answer abt my point "why paramacharyas of various peethas hv not recommended ur rotten, ass licking, money craving lotus feet as the real incarnation of god". r u trying to tell that they too r ignorant like me? they too lead a duryodhana-kinda life?
while fucking u hard did ur lotus-feet taught u that "sruti smruti virodhetu" means "sruti-is-against-smruti".
when u were fucking lotus-feet did he tell u that "gita-is-smruti"?
while fucking an all-surrendering-lady-devotee , did ur lotus-feet preach u that "i-am-the-hubby-of-goddes-lakshmi"?
i challenged to show one gita sloka which is incorporated by "over-intelligent persons". why did u turn blind on this ? no time to get out of ur lotus feet's bed?
===
talk abt these issues sucker. bark out ur arguments, prove urself first then equate urself with sankaracharya
yup! i-am-the-Mandana Misra-reincarnated. i am proud of it *L*
Posted by: Sagatu Telugu Jeevi At: 14, Jul 2007 3:09:19 PM IST
"Weak arguements are often defended & end-up in filthy language"
sparrow anna
lemme make sure to u that, i never defended my arguments. on every occassion he only failed to defend his side. in doing so he started calling me/us as "ignorant", "athiests", "duryodhana-kinda-ppl" etc etc. u might not be feeling the intensity of these words like "bastard", "fucker", "asshole". but i feel it. yup!!
i am talking to a upside-down-kinda fella. for him that is the only be-fitting lingo. compared to his vice, mine can easily be dubbed as virtue only
why no1 is feeling ashemed for his misinterpreations & misrepresentations? is he not doing the great sin on the earth? why the hell is he alwasy doing arm-twisting of veda, purana n upanishat quotes? why no1 is feeling pained for the raping of original meanings of hindu sastras? why no1 is teaching him to stop talking scrap abt hindu scriptures when he says "veda-contradicts-purana-contradicts-gita-contradicts-upanishat"?? is he not trying to influence the weak minded guys over here to hv a impression that hindu scriptures r nothing but bundles of contradictions?
when no1 is not bothered abt the way to keep this bastard silent, i went on my own way to stop so that he can't continue with his venomous arguments.
i still abide my rule of eye-for-eye in this issue. if at all that fella starts over again, i will make sure that he wud b dealt with stern lingo, let how filthy it might be. after all, my lingo might sound filthy, not my content *L*
Posted by: Sagatu Telugu Jeevi At: 14, Jul 2007 12:23:06 PM IST
Posted by: Mr. surya prakki At: 12, Jul 2007 7:37:27 PM IST
// Now you are calling Krishna as Lord. What is so great in that?//
avunumari. nijangaabhagavantuDini bhagavantuDanaDam lO goppEmiTi? bhagavantuDu kaani padmapaadulalaanTi TrayOlani bhagavantuDanaDamE goppa:))
// Goloka was created by Lord in Krishna avatara. Infact those sages in treta yuga (who latter on borned as Gopikas) asked Lord Rama to give them liberation. Lord assured them in their next birth. They borned as Gopikas and Lord came in the form of Krishna and given liberation to them. Lord Krishna created Goloka for Gopikas for their climax of devotion. How can Goloka exist before its creation by Lord? //
trEtaayugam lO maharshulu gOpikalugaa puTTalEdu. gOpikalugaa puTTinavaaru apsaraa strIlu. aa pramaaNaalu aadhyaatmika praSnalu, telugupadyaala antyaaksharilO ichchaanu.
maritamaru vaarE maharshulavataaraalu annadaaniki pramaaNam EmiTi?
alaagE vittam haristaananna vishNu puraaNam lO vunna SlOka sanKya kUDA pOshTu cheyyanDi.
inkaaduurvaasuDE raadhagaa janminchenannadaaniki kUDA.
cheppinadE maLLii maLLii vuurikinE chilakapalukullaa cheppaDamkaadu.
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 13, Jul 2007 11:42:15 AM IST
Oops its Bhava not Bhavaha
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 13, Jul 2007 10:31:53 AM IST
"Maatru Devaha" is Different from "Maatru Devo Bhavaha" ...
The word "Bhavaha ( Means "Being") makes all the difference ..
TO be frank I agree with some of the things about the Family bonds ...
If you mean to say
YOU SHOULD ALWAYS ABIDE BY THE TRUTH AND FOLLOW THE PATH OF JUSTICE, IRRESPECIVE OF YOUR FAMILY BONDS
then I agree with you .. but it looks like eyou have stretched this concept too far. (We even have the army men who Sacrifize their families and their ownlives for the sake of the Motherland. BUT IT DOES NOT MEAN EVERY PERSON ON EARTH SHOULD BECOME A SOLDIER)
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 13, Jul 2007 10:30:26 AM IST
Posted by: Mrs. Annapurna A At: 13, Jul 2007 3:41:19 AM IST
avunavunu. tappakunDA pOshTaali. lOkO bhinnaruchi@h annaTlu. alaa andha@h tamassulO pOvaalanukunEvaariki mari maargadarSanam kaavadduu?
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 13, Jul 2007 10:14:17 AM IST
Looks like I missed Something - Am I seeing one more "Kaki Lover" here?
Sagatu ... cool down man .. relax relax ... I havent read all the posts of surya yet .. but I dont agree with many of whatever I read.
lemme go thru all o them and get back ...
Posted by: Malakpet Rowdy At: 13, Jul 2007 10:09:44 AM IST
Posted by: స్పారో At: 13, Jul 2007 8:30:22 AM IST
avunu SankarjI avatalavaaLLu pichchikuutalu kuustunnaarani manam nOrup[aarEsukOkUDadu. sagaTujIvigaaru itarulu kUDA nOrupaarEsukOkumDA KanDistE baagunTundi
Posted by: Mr. HAYAGREEVA MURTY Rachuri At: 13, Jul 2007 9:56:12 AM IST
| |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
